Hundreds protest 'killing' of Adivasi youth by security forces in Jharkhand, govt inaction

By A Representative
Hundreds of people of Piri and nearby villages (Latehar district, Jharkhand) and representatives of several people’s organisations have protested at the Latehar district headquarters against the killing of Piri’s Adivasi youth Bramhadev Singh allegedly by security forces.
The dharna was organised by the Piri Gram Sabha with the support of several organisations – Akhil Bhartiya Adivasi Mahasabha, Akhil Jharkhand Kherwar Janjati Vikas Parishad, Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JJM) and the Sayunkt Gram Sabha (Latehar, Palamu, Garhwa).
On June 12, 2021, security forces, out on a Naxal search campaign, reportedly opened fire on innocent Adivasis of Piri village (Garu, Latehar) during which Bramhadev Singh was shot dead. Adivasis including Bramhadev were going out on a traditional hunting ritual, as every year, for the Sarhul festival. They all carried the single-fire Bhartua gun which is used to hunt small animals and birds like rabbits, pigs and chickens and to protect crops from animals.
The villagers did not fire a single shot, a communique from JJM said, adding, they raised their hands and shouted that they were common people and not Maoists. Yet, the security forces kept on firing. Instead of booking the perpetrators for the murder of Bramhadev Singh and violence, the local police filed an FIR against the six victims, including dead Bramhadev Singh, under various sections including Arms Act. Despite repeated applications by Bramhadev's wife and villagers to the police and administration, an FIR against security forces responsible for killing Bramhadev is yet to be filed.

At the end of the dharna, the organisers submitted a letter addressed to the chief minister to the deputy commissioner with the following major demands:

File an FIR, based on Jiramani Devi’s application, against the security forces personnel responsible for shooting Bramhadev Singh dead and ensure punitive action against them.
The FIR registered by the police on six Adivasis including Bramhadev should be quashed. Administrative action should be taken against the local police and senior officials for filing wrong statements and FIRs.
Bramhadev Singh should be given a compensation of at least ten lakh rupees. The government should take full responsibility of their son's upbringing, education and employment. Also, the remaining five victims should be compensated for harassment by the police.
People should not be harassed by security forces under the guise of anti-Naxal operations. Before running a search operation in a village area in fifth schedule areas, the consent of Gram Sabha and traditional village heads should be taken. Local administration and security forces should be trained and sensitised about Adivasi language, customs, culture and their world view.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan* The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.

Counterview

Search This Blog