Decision to merge nationalised banks violates national law: Civil society seminar told

Prof Jayati Ghosh, Dr Thomas Franco, Sitaram Yechury

By A Representative
Is the Government of India decision to merge 10 nationalised banks without any legal basis? Speaking at a recent seminar organised by the Financial Accountability Network India (FANI), Dr Thomas Franco, former general secretary, All-India Bank Officers’ Confederation, said, “Bank merger is against the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, which stipulates that the consent from board and shareholders is mandatory.”
Several participants in the seminar accused the step as a move to bail out the "struggling corporates", even as pointing out that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) decision to transfer Rs 1.76 lakh crore to the government as per the recommendations of the Bimal Jalan-led committee would on only "mess up with public finances."
Attended by representatives of civil society organisations, unions, students, teachers and concerned citizens, Sitaram Yechury, general secretary, CPI(M), told the seminar, “The transfer of RBI’s surplus to the government would destabilise RBI, make India vulnerable in an on-going global and domestic recession.” He added, the banks merger was done "at the behest of corporates, who have been demanding this to deal with one bank than the consortium of banks for the loans.”
Jayati Ghosh, professor of economics at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), asserted, “RBI’s autonomy died in November 2016 when the government declared demonetisation. The present government is the one without any accountability. The economic mess India is in also stems from this.” He added, "RBI’s money will go towards plugging in the holes created by the demonetisation and hastily implemented GST.”
Others who spoke on the occasion included Prof CP Chandrasekhar, professor of economics, JNU; Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, journalist and author; VK Tomar, secretary-general, National Confederation of Officers’ Associations of Central PSUs; and Purushottam Sharma, leader, CPI (ML).

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan* The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.

Counterview

Search This Blog