Skip to main content

Painting devil of Muslims? BJP leader 'deliberately' recalled fiction as historical fact

By Adv Masood Peshimam*
Once, a great Urdu drama writer Imtiaz Ali Taj happened to visit the grave of Anarkali, the kaniz or the courtier of Emperor Akbar at Lahore. Her name was Nadira, who hailed from Afghanistan. There is Anarkali Bazar at Lahore in Pakistan. Anarkali mattered much to Imtiaz Ali Taj. With a view to enlarge the canvas of Anarkali the dramatist thought of rolling out some new story with the touch of fiction.
He developed the whole drama of emperor Akbar having an affair with Anarkali with the copious details involving ironic court intrigues which was not largely synonymous with reality. Being an artist he inundated the whole drama with rich literary contents. Based on Taj's literary creation the theme occupied more literary space, with someone adding more plot to the situation with the sensational treatment to the subject.
It caught the imagination of director K Asif who made "Mughale Azam" which turned out be magnum opus of Indian cinema with the rich dialogue of Mirza Amanulla, Zeenat Aman's father. The morale of the story is that many a time untrue narrative is created around kings, nobles or big personalities to arouse attraction. The malignant intention may paint the personality as devil.
Attuned to the phenomenon of painting devil of Muslim kings, making a controversial statement of BJP president of Rajasthan, Madan Lal Saini said that Mughal emperor Akbar was a " molester" who used to organise "Meena Bazar" to exploit women. Saini also said that the kinds of misdeeds Akbar used to commit under guise are recorded in history, though without giving any reference.
He said that some Kiran Devi when confronted with the inappropriate activities of Emperor Akbar pushed him to the ground pointing a dagger to his chest. Akbar begged for his life lay at her feet which culminated into the closure of Meena Bazar.
The narrative of Saini is the product of fertile imagination not supported by the historical facts. The ruthless campaign to paint devil of Muslim rulers is to spew venom against Muslims to take the political advantage. The agenda of taking "historical revenge" is a convenient tool to target the Indian Muslims who are no way responsible for the deeds or misdeeds of Muslim rulers.
It is not out of context to note that the war between Muslim rulers and others were more of a political nature rather than religious. Religion had no role in it. The first Panipat battle was between Babar and Ibrahim Lodhi. There may be some gray areas, but looking everyone with disdain and contempt is not proper.
While finding lacuna with Muslim rule, its contribution, particularly in the field of architecture, cannot be overlooked. No less significant is to note that history cannot be applied to contemporary realities. It has become a fashion in India to play the political trump card by painting devil of Muslims, which needs to be avoided in the larger national interest.
---
*Based on Kalyan (West), Maharashtra. Click here to contact

Comments

TRENDING

Beyond the 'silent relocation' narrative in Bangladesh's Chittagong Hill Tracts

By Dr. Mohammad Asaduzzaman*  In recent years, a narrative has emerged from the rugged and forested terrain of the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), portraying the region as the site of a “silent relocation” — a mass forced migration of Bangladesh’s non-Muslim ethnic communities into neighboring India and Myanmar.

The farmer's burden: How oil, war, and climate are rewriting the price of food

By Vikas Meshram   The scorching flames of the Middle East conflict are now slowly reaching the kitchens of ordinary people. The true price of this war is paid in daily markets, vegetable shops, and in the shattered minds of farmers. Expensive crude oil, skyrocketing fertilizer prices, and rising agricultural costs are together creating the conditions for global food inflation — and this crisis is directly tied to what people eat and drink every day.

Ram, Bam and Bengal: Memories of a Left turn toward the Right

By Rajiv Shah   The BJP ’s massive electoral win in West Bengal is being interpreted across political persuasions — except, of course, by the BJP itself — as the result of the alleged deletion of around 90 lakh voters from the electoral rolls during the controversial intensive revision process. This may well be true, given my own experience in Gujarat regarding the shoddy manner in which electoral revisions have often been conducted. In West Bengal, there also appeared to be a political angle to the exercise. But I am not interested in discussing that here, as enough has already appeared in the media on the subject.