Skip to main content

2002 Gujarat 'massacre': Canadian Court issues summons for Prime Minister Modi; attorney general blocks it

By A Representative
A Canadian Court reportedly issued summons to visiting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi under Section 269.1 of the Canadian Criminal Code following a law suit filed under the aegis of the Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), which has offices in New York and Toronto which charged Modi for “torture and genocide in connection with the horrific anti-Muslim pogroms of 2002 in Gujarat”.
The summons were however “immediately blocked” by the Attorney General, Canada, apparently to avoid embarrassment to the Canadian government at a time when Modi was in that country on his three day visit.
The lawsuit was filed by two survivors of the Gujarat 2002 pogroms under the aegis of a group known as Sikhs For Justice, and had sought prosecution of Modi for acts of “human rights violations and assaults on religious freedom during the horrific massacres of 2002”, a statement by the American Justice Center (AJC), New York, and distributed by human rights activist Shabnam Hashmi, said.
The AJC statement said, “After a seven-hour pre-enquete hearing to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to issue process, the Justice of the Peace decided that process be issued. In other words, a court of law has finally recognized there is sufficient evidence of Modi's involvement in the massacre of Muslims in 2002, for Modi to be brought to trial.”
During the 2002 Gujarat riots, more than 1,000 persons, most of them Muslims, were killed, and 1.5 lakh people, again mainly Muslims, were displaced. During the riots, which continued for three months, rampaging mobs raped women, killed children, burnt houses, shops and other establishments.
Similar cases against Modi in US and Australia earlier failed in the court of law. In January, a US federal court in New York dismissed the lawsuit against Modi, saying he enjoys immunity as the sitting head of a foreign government.
AJC, however, claimed that the case in Canada “widens the legal troubles” for Modi. AJC said, “Representing SFJ, Toronto-based veteran constitutional and human rights lawyer Marlys Edwardh and her associate Louis Century called on Justice Minister Peter MacKay to charge Modi for torture and genocide in connection with the horrific anti-Muslim pogroms of 2002 in Gujarat, during his tenure as Chief Minister.”
"The summons issued by the Ontario Court of Justice, albeit blocked by the Attorney General, is a recognition of the voluminous evidence available to initiate prosecution of Modi, " said AJC President Joseph Whittington, Jr. "Had the summons been allowed to be served, we strongly believe the case would have ultimately served justice to those who have been denied for the pogroms of 2002."

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.