Skip to main content

Virbant Ahmedabad? Sabarmati riverfront oustees offered poor quality houses sans water and sanitation

By Hitesh Chavda
Even as the Vibrant Gujarat investors' summit entered its second day, facts have come to light suggesting how indifferently the oustees of a top state-sponsored project in Gujarat's business capital, Ahmedabad, are being treated by the state authorities. Latest information at the Ahmedabad Muncipal Corporation (AMC) suggests a sharp rise in complaints regarding extremely poor quality of houses, offered to hundreds of people uprooted because of the Sabarmati Riverfront, a project tom-tommed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “model” of urban development for other top Indian cities to follow.
While Opposition leader in the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), Badruddin Shaikh, a Congress councillor, has officially demanded that the oustees' living conditions, riddled with poor sanitation, lack of drinking water facilities, and pathetic quality of housing construction, should be “urgently addressed”, a visit to the area by this correspondent suggested that the authorities are, indeed, unconcerned towards the large number of complaints they are said to have received from the residents.
About five years ago, the AMC authorities “cleaned up” most of the Sabarmati riverfront of the slum in order to “beautify” it as a sort of picnic spot, setting aside the state government's own policy of rehabilitating slumdwellers at the very place where they stayed. Most of those who were “removed” were allocated housing accommodation far away from the their place of living, with experts pointing towards how it has affected their livelihood.
A visit to one of the sites revealed that even five years later the uprooted families have not settled down. In 2010, exactly 992 houses were provided to the economically weaker sections, majority of whom belonged to the Muslim minority community, in the Santhoshnagar area of Baherampura in Ahmedabad. The new site was named Sikandar Bhakht Nagar.
Sikandar Bhakht was one of the early Muslim politicians who joined the BJP. Bakht, who passed away in 2004, was a Delhi-based leader who was in the Congress, served as a Cabinet minister in Morarji Desai's Janata government in late 1970s, and joined the BJP in 1980. He became Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha in 1990s, and later in his career was made Cabinet minister in the Atal Behari Vajpayee government, which he remained till 2002.
The Government of India provided 50 per cent of fund under the Jawarharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM), floated by the previous UPA government in Delhi to develop urban infrastructure, for the construction of these houses. One of the JNNURM's components has been to provide housing to the poor. Rest of the amount was provided by the AMC and the Gujarat government.
Direct interaction with people at the Sikandar Bakht Nagar suggested that people still live in sub-human conditions. Babukhan Pathan, a resident of the housing colony, said, “Most of the houses face the problem of poor construction. Worse, there is no water connection in many bathrooms, sewage pipelines are broken at most of the places. To sum up, there are huge issues with quality for the type of work contractors, chosen by the authorities, have done.”
Walking into a bathroom, Pathan showed how the water from the ceilings had started seeping into his house because of the poor quality of construction work. He complained, at several places, even the plaster has not been completed, both inside the houses and the outside walls, and the tiles have started coming out. “This is true of all the 900-odd houses here”, he claimed.
Another resident, Yusuf Sheikh, said, "There are huge problems of cleanliness and drinking water in the area. Don't we have the right to live as equal citizens of Ahmedabad? Why are we being discriminated against only because we are poor?” Taking this correspondent around, he added, “The cement concrete of the terrace and many houses’ walls are coming out.” Other residents also complained that nobody is listening to them once they were allocated these houses in 2010.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.