Skip to main content

Three dead in attack reported on Muslim-dominated South Gujarat village, likely to witness major industrial activity

By A Representative
Reports from Bharach district of South Gujarat say, three persons were killed and a a dozen others others injured following clashes between two communities in and around Hansot village. While the police claimed the "the situation is now under control" with extra force having  been summoned, the clashes took place because of a scuffle between two groups over catching the kites in nearby Ambeta village during Makarsankranti celebrations on January 14.
Meanwhile, in a “media alert”, well-known human rights activist Shabnam Hashmi has made public three photographs of Hansot village of Bharuch district in Gujarat, where houses, shops and farms were burnt. In a social media post, Hashmi has forwarded a mail from one of the residents of Hansot, which says that Hansot, with a population is around 5000, out of this 3,000 are Muslims and is surround by 52 other villages which are dominated by the majority community, a rein of fear and tension prevails.
“A small issue led to people from neighbouring villages attacking the Muslims of Hansot”, the post written by an individual from the village, said, adding, “The police was present but they did not take any action. Even the ambulance, which carried injured, were attacked. Farms too were not spared. They were set on fine.” It added, “Hindu fundamentalists are providing full support in terms of police and administration.”
Commenting on the incident, Hashmi, who has been active in all anti-Modi campaigns across the country, including Gujarat, said, this again shows that, despite claims to the contrary, “Gujarat continues to burn”, adding, "Boys from the minority community community are being picked up." Commented another activist in a Facebook post, this suggests "even kites bring communal disharmony in Gujarat".
Sleepy Hansot shot into prominence two years ago following the decision of the Gujarat government to have a barrage on the mouth of the Narmada river to divert river waters through the canal to the proposed Kalpasar project, proposed as a huge sweet water lake in the Gulf of Khambhat. To be built between Dahej and Hansot, a six-lane road has been envisaged on top of the barrage for free flow of industrial traffic between Dahej and Hazira, two most important industrial townships of Gujarat.
The barrage would reduce the traffic distance between the two industrial area, which have ports attached to them, by nerly 24 km, apart from the hassle of the huge traffic flow on the highway towards Surat and further on to Mumbai.
While the economic significance, including real estate activity, of the whole area, including Hansot, is all set to go up manifold because of the project, a state-sponsored report, “Environmental Impact and Risk Assessment for the Proposed Barrage across River Narmada near Bhadbhut, Dist. Bharuch”, by Government of India consultants National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), talked of possibilities of silting in the immediate upstream of the barrage, leading to “undue sedimentation” gathering in area.
The barrage has received environmental clearance from the Government of India, and already international interest is being shown for its development. Ahead of the Vibrant Gujarat business meet, which took place on January 11-12 in Gandhinagar, a major Chinese engineering company offered to implement in public-private partnership.
Media reports quoting highly placed sources said the state government has decided to take up work on the project soon, as apart from environmental clearance, has received coastal regulation zone (CRZ) clearance, too. As a result, they add, the China Harbor Engineering Company, has “shown interest in the project”. The barrage and the road is proposed to cost Rs 3,500 crore.

Comments

Unknown said…
"......the economic significance, including real estate activity, of the whole area, including Hansot, is all set to go up manifold because of the project," appears to be the bane of contention

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.