Skip to main content

Top Gandhian questions UN chief's forthcoming visit to Vibrant Gujarat "mela" for corporate honchos

Dr Sudarshan Iyengar
By A Representative
Senior Gandhian and thinker Sudarshan Iyengar has taken strong exception to United Nations (UN) secretary-general Ban Ki- moon’s decision to deliver keynote address at the Vibrant Gujarat world business meet on January 11 at Gandhinagar, saying, the topmost UN dignitary’s participation in the “mela” of business honchos does not augur well with the overall UN ideology. In an article he has penned for Gujarati journal “Nireekshak”, Dr Iyengar said, among the main directions the UN is supposed to take include sustainable development, guarding against manmade and natural disasters, working against violent conflicts and for peace, and defending human rights.
Pointing out that Ki-moon himself declared this as his agenda on January 25, 2012, when he took over the office for the second term, Iyengar, who just retired as vice-chancellor of Mahatma Gandhi-founded university, Gujarat Vidyapeeth in Ahmedabad, said, as none of this is the agenda of the Vibrant Gujarat summit, it is “difficult to understand” why the UN secretary-general is trying to give credence to the “mela”. The “mela”, he said, is aimed at discussing different types of offers Gujarat has made to attract business investment.
“It is strange that international leaders, who should be discussing this with national leaders, are attending a state function of this type. It is particularly a matter of serious concern that the UN secretary-general has accepted the invitation”, Iyengar underlined in his hard-hitting comment, which he forwarded to www.counterview.net.
Not only does the UN secretary-general’s presence in the top Gujarat event “undermine the dignity” of the post Ki-moon holds, the senior Gandhian said, his presence at the Vibrant Gujarat 2015 is of "significance" for another reason, too. “The UN’s main agenda include ending to conditions of violent conflicts between nations, working for equality and justice, and providing a secure livelihood. If Ki-moon fails to offer this during his keynote speech, one would only conclude that the UN is acting under the direct pressure of world market forces and business honchos.”
Placard welcoming Ki-moon to Vibrant Gujarat 
Pointing towards “structural violence” that is prevailing in some parts of the world because of sharply-accelerated discrimination based on gender, caste, creed, religion and race, Iyengar suggested that the UN’s aim should be to work for ensuring to root out such conflicts.
“There is a further acceleration in these conflicts because of the sale of latest technology arms and ammunition in the free world market. This is undermining world peace”, he said, regretting, India has already emerged as the largest importer of armaments in the world, against the backdrop of the “perceived threat” it faces from its neighbours. The defence-related imports have gone up by a whopping 111 per cent in the last five years, and there is no end to it.
Giving the example of latest technology military choppers and other armaments are sought from the US in the wake of the recent Modi visit to Washington, with Russia now sharply chipping in, making the US wary, Iyengar said, back home, in India, “structural violence” can be seen taking new forms.
Already, he said, the “Hinduist organizations and individuals” are seeking forced conversion as a panacea for India’s ills at a time when Modi is talking of pushing the country towards faster economic growth. Seen against this backdrop, the Gandhian said, Ki-moon’s visit would only give an additional credence to the view that emergence of India as a theological states, a Hindu Rashtra, is “essential for fighting Islamic extremism and terrorism.”

Comments

Somal Thakore said…
The UN is ultimately a puppet with the US and European Global Lobbies.

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.