Skip to main content

'Stop arbitrary blockades on roads to farm land, mosque off West Bengal border'

Counterview Desk 
In a complaint to the District Magistrate, Coochbehar, West Bengal, human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), has said that there is “unlawful restriction of villagers” from not only going to their own farmlands”, but also their mosque, imposed by BSF personnel in the Jhaukuthi Village of Tufanganj I block, under Tufanganj PS.
Roy, in a representation, demanded, “BSF must stop putting up arbitrary blockades on the roads in Jhaukuthi and harassing and inconveniencing the villagers. The border fence must be shifted to the actual international border, along the International Border Pillars, and not pass through the Jhaukuthi Village; and BSF must also be posted at the actual border, not inside the village.”

Text:

I want to bring into your notice the matter of unlawful restriction of villagers from going to their own farmlands, and the unlawful blockade of a mosque (the only mosque in the area) by BSF personnel in the Jhaukuthi Village of Tufanganj I block, under Tufanganj PS, Cooch Behar district, West Bengal; wherein the said restrictions and blockades have been imposed by the 31st Battalion of Border Security Force stationed at gate no. 3 of the Jhaukuthi Border Outpost. BSF personnel have arbitrarily dug trenches and built blockades and checkposts on the CPWD road passing through the village on the superfluous pretext of preventing smuggling, and these trenches have, on one instance, entirely blocked the passage of some of the villagers to their own agricultural land situated inside the border fence, and on another instance, blocked the entrance to the only mosque in this village populated by a 100 percent Muslim population.
In fact, the border fence is not constructed on the actual border between India and Bangladesh, but contrarily, built well inside the Indian Territory and through the villages and habitation of the bordering populace in Cooch Behar District. This phenomenon of erratic fencing is very normal through the Indo-Bangladesh bordering areas of West Bengal and causing immense encroachment on the rights and freedoms of bordering populace.
On fact-finding, we find two cases of unlawful restrictions imposed by the BSF personnel of the 31st Battalion, stationed at Gate no. 3, Jhaukuthi BOP, on the movement and congregation of villagers in the Jhaukuthi Village under the Balabhut Panchayat, Tufanganj I Block, Cooch Behar District, resulting in gross impediments to their livelihoods and their religious practices. The village consists entirely of Muslim families.
On 28th December, 2022, BSF personnel have arbitrarily put a bamboo fence across the road connecting the village to the CPWD road, and have blocked all movement on that road that had been used by about 100 peasant families to access the CPWD road as well as to transport the produce of their land. They now have to take a detour of about 2 kilometers to reach a point which is only 50 meters away; and the path they now have to take is full of inconveniences and dangers and they somehow undertake the unsafe journey through shrubbery, swamps and across streams, everyday.
Said peasants’ agricultural lands are also situated inside the barbed-wire border fence which passes through Jhaukathi village, well inside the Indian Territory. This road that is now blocked by the BSF was also the only road via which they used to transport their crop produce.
They submitted a petition to the BDO, Tufanganj I block on the very next day of installation of this bamboo blockade, but no action was taken. They submitted another petition to the BDO on 22nd May, 2023, begging to remove this illegal blockade, but, despite repeated requests, no initiative has yet been taken to investigate this matter or remove the blockade.
There is one mosque to the north of Gate no. 3, Jhaukuthi BOP, where about 100 families from the area offer their prayers (namaz) five times a day, everyday; as well as offer their prayers on the two festivals of Eid-ul-Fitr and Eid-uz-Zoha. BSF personnel from the 31st Battalion stationed at gate no.3, Jhaukuthi BOP, brought in heavy machinery and dug a trench in front of the mosque, and put up a bamboo barricade in front of the gate of the mosque – blocking all access to this place of community worship. Hayder Ali, Secretary of the Management Commitee of said Mosque, alongwith other residents of Jhaukuthi village, submitted a written petition to the BDO, Tufanganj I Block, Cooch Behar, requesting that the blockade be lifted. This is a gross violation of the villagers’ fundamental right to pursue their religious practice, putting a direct blockade on their place of religious congregation and worship; but, no action has been undertaken by the BDO so far in alleviating this violation and removing the unlawful blockade as well as restoring the road leading to the mosque.
These arbitrary and illegal blockades by BSF are in gross violation of the fundamental rights of the people of Jhaukuthi to free movement within their own country and to pursue their own religious faith and manage their religious affairs. It stands in violation of:
Sub-clause (d) of Clause (1) of Article 19 and Article 26, Constitution of India are being violated by the posted BSF troops under command of COY Commander of Jhoukuthi BOP, 31 BN BSF.
We therefore request your immediate intervention in this matter, with the following demands from our side:
  1. The unlawful blockade (on the road connecting the village to the CPWD road) in front of the CPWD road passing beside Jhaukuthi village must be lifted immediately, allowing safe passage of villagers and agricultural produce.
  2. The unlawful blockade in front of the Mosque in Jhaukuthi must be lifted immediately and the government must repair the damage done to the road in front of the mosque due to trench-digging by BSF.
  3. BSF must stop putting up arbitrary blockades on the roads in Jhaukuthi and harassing and inconveniencing the villagers. The border fence must be shifted to the actual international border, along the International Border Pillars, and not pass through the Jhaukuthi Village; and BSF must also be posted at the actual border, not inside the village.
  4. If the land that falls between the current border fence and the IBP is needed by the Government of India for the purposes of national security, then the government must procure said land under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, and pay due compensation and rehabilitation to the peasants.

Comments

TRENDING

Telangana government urged to stop 'unconstitutional' relocation of Chenchu tribes

By A Representative   The Nallamalla forests are witnessing a renewed surge of indigenous resistance as the Chenchu adivasis , a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), have formally launched the Chenchu Solidarity Forum (CSF) on the eve of World Earth Day to combat what they describe as unlawful and forced relocation from the Amrabad Tiger Reserve . 

Kolkata dialogue flags policy and finance deficit in wetland sustainability

By A Representative   Wetlands were the focus of India–Germany climate talks in Kolkata, where experts from government, business, and civil society stressed both their ecological importance and the urgent need for stronger conservation frameworks. 

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

'Fraudulent': Ex-civil servants urge President to halt Odisha tribal land dispossession

By A Representative   A collective of 81 retired civil servants from the Constitutional Conduct Group has written to the President of India expressing alarm over what they describe as the wrongful dispossession of tribal lands in Odisha’s Rayagada district. The letter, dated April 19, 2026, highlights violent clashes in Kantamal village where police personnel reportedly injured over 70 tribal residents attempting to protect their community rights. 

Cracks in Gujarat model? Surat’s exodus reveals precarity behind prosperity claims

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*   The return of migrant workers from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, particularly from Gujarat, was inevitable. Gujarat has long been showcased as the epitome of “infrastructure” and the business-friendly Modi model. Yet, when governments become business-friendly, they require the poor to serve them—while keeping them precarious, unable to stabilize, demand fair wages, or assert their rights. The agenda is clear: workers must remain grateful for whatever crumbs the Seth ji offers.  

Dhandhuka violence: Gujarat minority group seeks judicial action, cites targeted arson

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat has written to the Director General of Police seeking judicial action in connection with recent violence in Dhandhuka town of Ahmedabad district, alleging targeted attacks on properties belonging to members of the Muslim community following a fatal altercation between two bike riders on April 18.

Maoist activity in India: Weakening structures, 'shifts' in leadership, strategy and ideology

By Harsh Thakor*  Recent statements by government representatives have suggested that Maoism in India has been effectively eliminated, citing the weakening of central leadership and intensified security operations. These claims follow sustained counterinsurgency efforts across key regions, including central and eastern India. However, available information from security agencies and independent observers indicates that while the organizational structure of the CPI (Maoist) has been significantly disrupted, elements of the movement remain active. Reports acknowledge the continued presence of cadres in certain forested regions such as Bastar and parts of Dandakaranya, alongside smaller, decentralized units adapting their operational strategies.

Why link women’s reservation to delimitation? The unspoken political calculus

By Vikas Meshram*  April 16, 2026, is likely to be recorded as a special day in the history of Indian democracy. In a three-day special session of Parliament, the central government is set to introduce a comprehensive package of three historic bills: the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026; the Delimitation Bill, 2026; and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The stated purpose of all three is the same: to implement the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Constitutional Amendment) passed in 2023. However, the political intent concealed behind these measures — and their impact on the federal balance — is far more profound. It is absolutely essential to understand this.

The high price of unemployment: The human cost of the drug crisis in J&K

​By Raqif Makhdoomi*  ​ Jammu and Kashmir is no longer merely at risk of a drug epidemic ; it is losing the fight. The statistics are staggering, with approximately 13.5 lakh people—nearly 8% of the total population—caught in the grip of substance abuse . In the ranking of Indian Union Territories , Jammu and Kashmir now sits at a grim top. We have officially reached a point where we can no longer speak in hypotheticals about a future crisis. The vocabulary has shifted from "if" to "if not addressed immediately."