Skip to main content

Believe this: US' 95% of Covid cases are Omicron, India's 2%, model Gujarat's 0.43%

 
By Rajiv Shah 
Scanning through news stories on Omicron, the new Covonavirus variant said to have been found in South Africa, I came across an interesting story, published in the New York-based network, CBS News. According to this story, published a couple of days ago, “The Omicron variant made up around 95.4% of new Covid-19 cases in the US last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said.”
It added, “Only two regions of the US -- New England and part of the Midwest -- have yet to reach 90% locally. The Delta variant, which was dominant up until a few weeks ago, makes up nearly all the other cases.”
I got interested in this news item after I found that in my state, Gujarat, they were reporting very few Omicron cases, if one goes by the data fished out by the State government. Last weekend, on Saturday, for instance, Gujarat reported just about 23 new Omicron cases, which is said to have taken the tally of the “highly infectious” variant to 136, the State health department data said.
This comes, to -- imagine! – less than 0.43% of the total Covid cases in Gujarat, which was 5,396 cases on that day. What a sharp contrast, I thought, if one compares to what one find in the US. A report said,  the 5,396 cases was the highest reported tally in 24 hours, with daily cases increasing 10-fold from 51 on December 19.
This made me look at the total Covid and Omicron cases India reported in India on that day: It was 1,41,986 on Saturday. However, on the same very day, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare said, there just about 3,071 cases (or just about 2.16%) of the Omicron variant reported from across India.
So, should one conclude that “model” Gujarat was doing an excellent job in containing Omicron? If India was doing much, much better than the US, Gujarat was doing it far better than even India, if one goes by the official data released in US, India and Gujarat.
Currently "holidaying" in US, I decided to contact one of my journalist friends in Gujarat to find out whether this is true. He agreed that there was a “story here”, but revealed to me that the State government had “virtually stopped” doing what is called “genome sequencing” for Omicron.
Looking at stories that emanated from Gujarat, I came across one in "Indian Express", which said, the State’s high-profile laboratory in Gandhinagar, the State capital, the Gujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), was receiving just about “five to seven ‘high priority’ samples per day “for genome sequencing ever since the guidelines in view of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 came into effect with nearly 10 per cent of the samples detected with Omicron so far.”
I said to myself: Wow! What a model I have back home! Just 10% of 5-7 samples per day were Omicron! Less than one per day! This was of course about a week ago, but ever since the number of “high priority” cases being sent to GBRC may have gone up, I presumed.
I recalled: About two years ago, I had read about a controversy surrounding GBRC: When the number of deaths as a result of Covid drastically went up in April 2020, with the State government in a fix on explaining as to why it may have happened, the GBRC director came up with the theory what the high Covid-19 mortality rate in Gujarat could be due to the dominance of the L-type strain of coronavirus, found to have been more prevalent in Wuhan in China, where the outbreak started.
The story, carried in several dailies, quoted the director as stating, “Analysis done by scientists abroad has shown that the L-type strain has been dominant where more mortality is reported among coronavirus patients. This strain was found to be more prevalent in Wuhan."
Ironically, and this is very amusing, as this conclusion was based on examining Covid sample from just one patient. “The coronavirus sample we collected from a patient for genome sequence contained the L-type strain. This strain has a much higher virulence as compared to the S-strain,” the GBRC director reportedly said. The story I am quoting appeared in “The Hindu” on April 26, 2020.
Within two days, the online news portal, run by well-known journalist Shekhar Gupta, “The Print”, carried a strong refutation, suggesting that as of April 2020 – two years ago -- “there weren’t different strains of the novel coronavirus, just different mutations.”
Total number of deaths in Gujarat last year was a whopping 230% higher than what they were in 2018-19, the non-Covid years
The long report, full of technical details, stated, “In some media reports that appeared in India, Chaitanya Joshi, director of the state-run GBRC in Gandhinagar, which itself sequenced the novel coronavirus and provided data to Next Strain, was quoted as saying that L-type is known to cause higher mortality and that analysis done by scientists abroad have confirmed this.”
It underlined, “Joshi, who specialises in veterinary and animal sciences, said, ‘The coronavirus sample we collected from a patient for genome sequence contained the L-type strain. This strain has a much higher virulence as compared to the S-strain’.”
The report, by Sandhya Ramesh, insisted, “But there has been no such finding in the scientific community. This unproven theory about varying virulence is frequently used the world over to explain deaths or disease patterns that are not yet understood.”
Asserting that “Gujarat is wrong”, the refutation said, the L-type strain was considered “aggressive” due to its widespread prevalence, which by itself was affected by mobility restrictions and physical distancing measures, but “reports of one ‘strain’ being more deadly than the other have been regularly debunked by virologists online, including by the founders of Next Strain, a public database onto which sequenced genomes are uploaded.”
One has only to recall how Gujarat has been trying to underplay a huge spike in deaths as a result of Covid. According to one report, which appeared in “The Times of India”, Ahmedabad, a couple of days ago, the total number of deaths in Gujarat last year was a whopping 230% higher than what they were in 2018-19, the non-Covid years. And this was higher than any other State of India.
The report said, “A paper by researchers from India, Canada and the US indicated that the overall all-cause death during April-May 2021 peak Covid second wave was 230% higher in Gujarat as compared to average monthly mortality recorded in 2018-19. According to the estimates, Gujarat’s death toll rose from average 17,000 per month to 39,000 per month during April-May 2021.”
“This was the highest among 16 Indian states under survey. The paper, published in the international journal Science, claimed that the all-India excess was 120% as the deaths rose from average 3.75 lakh to 4.5 lakh for the two months”, the report said.

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”