Skip to main content

Citizenship law: Would Govt of India give in to 'mob' pressure? There is precedent

By NS Venkataraman*
The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was passed in both the houses of Indian Parliament after majority of members voted in favour of the Act. The immigrant issue emerged following the partition of India in 1947. Several prime pinisters in the past, including those of the Congress. wanted to regularize citizenship in India , but they were not courageous enough to catch the bull by the horn.
Now, the Modi government has tackled the issue. CAA was extensively discussed in both the houses of Parliament, highlighting the pluses and minuses of the issue. Finally, the majority opinion prevailed. In a healthy democracy and orderly society, it is necessary that the majority opinion is accepted gracefully by all concerned.
Some political parties and activists wanted to defy the decision of Parliament. They whipped up public agitation against CAA, incited hatred and violence, leading to bitter confrontation. This has tarnished the image of India as a progressive and forward-looking nation.
The anti-CAA agitation was supposed to have been started by the student community, many of whom are politicians in the making. It was taken over by political parties and activists and a section of the media, which gave wide publicity to protests, refusing to condemn violence.
Destruction of public property and setting on fire police vehicles and police stations were justified by some opposition leaders, activists and media, as if all this reflected the anger of the people. It amounted to justifying violence and hooliganism.
Some opposition leaders and activists want the CAA issue should be taken to the United Nations. It seems these type of statements have emanated out of frustration, as they could not defeat Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the last elections. Now they want to defeat him on streets by encouraging violence and creating law and order problems.
India consist of more than 1,300 million people. Those indulging in violence are just a few hundreds. They do not represent India, nor do they reflect the overall view of the majority of people. They disrupted normal life without understanding about the limits of democracy. Freedom cannot be absolute, it has limits.
They disrupted normal life without understanding limits of democracy. Freedom cannot be absolute, it has limits
The issue that concerns one and all is, will mob violence force the government to take decisions? If this happens, what will be the future of India? We are on a critical crossroad. The Government of India must act with determination, using carrot and stick approach. The issue of CAA has to be explained to the people by the government, as suggested by the Chief Justice of India.
India’s stability would be threatened if mob psychology is allowed to prevail. It may very well happen. There have been precedents. Several projects have been stopped or suspended in the recent past following public protests, many of them supported by political parties and activists, even though the authorities had carried out detailed investigation and approved them.
In several cases, state governments, and sometimes even the Central government, have bowed to the will of the mob. In the process, India has lost many opportunities. This situation cannot be allowed to continue any longer.
The government has the great responsibility of putting down negative elements with all the force at its command for the sake of long-term stability and progress of India. This would be very much in keeping with the spirit of democracy and protect it.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

BRICS ends, but Bangladesh's empty chair says more than any declaration

By Nava Thakuria  The 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit, hosted by India at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi on 12-13 September 2026, has concluded with leaders formally adopting the New Delhi Declaration. The gathering, themed "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," drew Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and other leaders of the now 11-member bloc, along with heads of partner organisations such as ASEAN, the African Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Diplomats had worked through the final hours to bridge differences — notably between Iran and the UAE over West Asian tensions — before the declaration was signed.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

BAPS, the Eiffel Tower and the curious silence on secularism

By Rajiv Shah   I was a little surprised to see how some of those whom I respect for taking a firm stand on patriarchal issues reacted to the manner in which they responded to the recent incident in Paris, in which women employees of the Eiffel Tower were asked to remain "invisible" on September 5 when 100 BAPS sadhus visited one of the world's top tourist destinations.