Skip to main content

A tale of fourteen: How Hindutva broke India's political tradition

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
India has had fourteen Prime Ministers since independence. Gulzarilal Nanda and Manmohan Singh each served twice, while Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Narendra Modi were elected for three terms each. Different ideological traits define their politics. Each Prime Minister brings a certain set of principles and a personal and political framework to the office and to policymaking. Idealism in politics breeds public confidence, and idealist leaders not only earn that confidence but also shape the destiny of millions of people and of the country itself.
The first Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, not only shaped modern, democratic, liberal, secular, and constitutional India but also provided direction to navigate the country through the troubled waters of world politics. As a freedom fighter, he stood for anti-colonial struggles across the globe and offered socialist humanism as an alternative within a liberal, social democratic framework. Personal sacrifice defined his politics of social change. He defined India to the world, and the world to Indians. As a visionary leader, he prioritised secular and scientific education, health, and individual freedom as the foundations of development.
The second and fourth Prime Minister, Gulzarilal Nanda, was a research scholar of labour economics who pursued the interests of working people without inhibition. A freedom fighter shaped by a Gandhian way of life, he served twice as Prime Minister yet died without owning any private property. At a time when corruption consumes politics and public life in India, Nanda stands as a lighthouse of political probity. He was also a forthright critic of the undemocratic and authoritarian rule of Indira Gandhi and opposed the Emergency she imposed.
The third Prime Minister, Lal Bahadur Shastri, continues to inspire by the example of his honesty in personal and public life. He served the country during challenging times and helped develop the cooperative movement, which contributed to the growth of food and milk production. As a freedom fighter, he was committed to the ideals of socialist democracy, individual freedom and prosperity, world peace, and friendship with all countries regardless of their ideological differences.
Indira Gandhi, the fifth and eighth Prime Minister, led the country through troubled times. As a freedom fighter, she steered the Green Revolution towards a self-reliant and food-secure India, though that revolution also deepened agricultural capitalism in the country. Her anti-poverty campaigns, nationalisation of banks, and well-crafted foreign policy made India a formidable force in world affairs. Her authoritarian tendencies, however, weakened the process of deepening democracy and democratic institutions.
As the sixth Prime Minister, Morarji Desai was also a freedom fighter known for his unwavering commitment to regional and world peace. He was secular but socially conservative in the Gandhian tradition, opposing Nehruvian socialist policies while supporting the American idea of free enterprise and pro-business economics. Yet he was also one of the pillars of the Total Revolution against corruption led by the socialist Jayaprakash Narayan. Ideological contradictions defined his politics, but he never compromised personal integrity in public life.
The seventh Prime Minister, Chaudhary Charan Singh, was a freedom fighter who followed Gandhian principles and was committed to the cause of farmers, land reform, and rural development. He opposed the caste system and Nehruvian socialism and advocated land ownership by the tillers. He did not believe in the cooperative model but in the capacity of individual farmers who owned their land. His simplicity, honesty, and integrity defined his life in politics.
Rajiv Gandhi, the ninth Prime Minister, led a technological revolution and the decentralisation of development politics. Despite his charm and decency, he governed through a coterie, much like his mother Indira Gandhi, who may be regarded as the originator of coterie politics in India. The ideology-free zone in contemporary politics began with his half-hearted liberalisation of the Indian economy, which allowed market forces not only to consolidate their base but also to begin dictating the terms of economic policy. He is nonetheless remembered as a moderniser for his commitment to the technological transformation of the country.
Vishwanath Pratap Singh, the tenth Prime Minister, was defined by his unwavering commitment to lower-caste, working-class, and marginalised communities. His government shaped the social justice movement in India by implementing the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Social justice and secularism were the twin pillars of his politics and leadership.
The eleventh Prime Minister, Chandra Shekhar, was a firebrand socialist student leader committed to the principles of secular and democratic socialism and opposed to all forms of authoritarianism. He used politics as a tool of mass mobilisation to celebrate and advance religious harmony, social justice, and cultural inclusiveness in the service of national unity and integrity.
Pamulaparthi Venkata Narasimha Rao, the twelfth Prime Minister and a freedom fighter, is known as a polymath who pioneered the new economic reforms establishing liberalisation, privatisation, and globalisation and thereby deepening free market capitalism in the country. He may be regarded as the father of the marketisation of Indian politics, as demonstrated by the manner in which he managed his minority government to remain in power following the no-confidence vote of July 1993. He provided political leadership to the capitalist class by creating the conditions necessary for the pursuit of policies in defence of capitalism.
Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the thirteenth and sixteenth Prime Minister, laid the foundation for Hindutva politics in India through his control of the state and government. European-style ethnonationalism rooted in majoritarianism, a Brahminical Hindu social order, the othering of Muslims and minorities, crony capitalism, and a pro-American foreign policy are the five pillars of Hindutva politics that shaped Vajpayee's ideological worldview — though he carried them behind a liberal and smiling face. He continued the new economic policies of the Narasimha Rao-led Congress government without any of the inhibitions one might associate with Hindutva nationalism.
The fourteenth Prime Minister, H. D. Deve Gowda, had his politics shaped by agrarian socialism, secularism, and regional autonomy through greater decentralisation. He made many compromises in the pursuit of power, however, and in the name of pragmatism abandoned his ideological commitments to seek office rather than to govern on principle.
The fifteenth Prime Minister, Inder Kumar Gujral, was a freedom fighter and a committed communist whose internationalist outlook led him to draft a world constitution for global governance aimed at upholding both regional and world peace. A diplomat, humanist, and visionary, he believed in collaborative politics even as he followed a combative ideological praxis. Integrity in public life was integral to his politics.
Manmohan Singh, the seventeenth and eighteenth Prime Minister, is remembered as a gentleman who pursued Nehruvian socialism tempered by market logic. He helped shape the new economic reforms under the Narasimha Rao government, pursued them as Finance Minister, and consolidated them during his own two terms as Prime Minister. His tenures were marked by significant achievements as well as controversies, but he managed to remain above those controversies through grace, decency, honesty, and personal integrity. He led a simple life throughout, and the commitment to human welfare remained the defining thread of his leadership.
Narendra Modi is the longest-serving Prime Minister in Indian history, currently in his third term, which runs from 2014 to 2029. No other Prime Minister has managed to sustain such political tenure with so little serious challenge. Propaganda over substance defines his politics. India's Prime Ministers have promised and failed before, but none had used deception as a deliberate political strategy to conceal failures and divert public attention from them. Nehru openly critiqued his own government and leadership. The other Prime Ministers, for all their contradictions, were known for integrity and honesty in personal and political life. Modi, by contrast, has weaponised deception to hollow out liberal, secular, and constitutional democracy and its institutions.
He promised to deposit ₹15 lakh in every citizen's bank account, create two crore jobs every year, double farmers' incomes, and build a hundred smart cities. Indian voters have yet to see any serious policy effort towards these goals. Broken promises are the core of the deceptive politics he practises. The goalposts shift every year. Beyond the democratic deficit, the Modi-led Hindutva government has presided over economic stagnation, growing unemployment, an agrarian crisis, the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few favoured corporations, and a foreign policy of subordination to the United States. Hindutva deploys the toxic politics of hate, fear, and deception to mobilise the masses, only to abandon them once power is secured. Claims of economic growth and development under BJP rule remain, for ordinary Indians, a myth.
Hindutva regimes have been the most productive period for India's capitalist class, while working Indians suffer every form of marginalisation. Hindutva crony capitalism is a project designed by and for capital to uphold its own interests in Indian politics and the economy. There is no basis for hope in any progressive or prosperous transformation under a Hindutva regime, whether under Modi or any other leader within that tradition. Hindutva politics has not only consolidated the crony capitalist order shaped by the Congress Party but has stripped politics of any remaining principle. It benefits only corporations and reactionaries.
Hindutva and its leaders neither breed public confidence nor design policies for the prosperity of ordinary Indians or the future of the country. They are in the business of serving cronies at the expense of the people. It is therefore imperative to defeat Hindutva for the revival of an Indian economy and a political order that genuinely works for the people.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Congo lithium mining: Mineral rush spearheaded by US, Europe, other major powers

By Layne Hartsell, Max Wilbert, Ntafakabirhi-Aganze Clovis  Like oil in the twentieth century, lithium is the ‘white gold’ of the twenty-first. Demand for this key element is driving economic growth based on the ‘renewable’ energy provided by lithium-ion batteries. Such batteries are necessary for storing energy from solar photovoltaics in order to make that electricity readily available. A lightweight metal, lithium is generally processed into a white powder after being extracted from brines or salty water ponds and from underground deposits.