Skip to main content

Public health group NAPi opposes fresh consultations on front-of-pack warning labels

By A Representative 
Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has written to the Chairperson of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), expressing concern over the regulator’s decision to convene another stakeholder consultation on the Food Safety and Standards (Labelling and Display) Regulations, 2020, particularly regarding the introduction of front-of-pack warning labels on packaged food products.
In a letter addressed to FSSAI Chairperson Punya Salila Srivastava, NAPi said the additional consultation scheduled on 19 March could delay the implementation of an important public health measure aimed at informing consumers about foods high in fat, sugar and salt.
NAPi, a network of public health professionals and consumer advocates, acknowledged the opportunity to participate in regulatory discussions but questioned the need for reopening deliberations on front-of-pack labelling, stating that the issue has already undergone extensive consultations and technical reviews over several years.
The group pointed out that the matter is also under consideration before the Supreme Court of India, which has suggested that pre-packaged food products should carry warning labels on the front of the package to alert consumers. According to NAPi, reopening broad consultations at this stage could further postpone the adoption of a long-pending consumer protection measure.
The organisation also raised concerns about the participation of food industry associations in the consultation process, saying their commercial interests could create conflicts of interest in regulatory decision-making. NAPi argued that while industry perspectives may be relevant during the implementation phase, the design of public health warnings intended to inform consumers about unhealthy food products should remain insulated from commercial influence. It added that consumer protection must remain paramount under provisions of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
NAPi urged FSSAI to proceed with the regulatory process for front-of-pack warning labels based on existing evidence, past consultations and judicial observations rather than initiating further rounds of stakeholder deliberations. It also requested the regulator to ensure that future consultations on food regulatory design remain free from commercial influence.
As part of its submissions, NAPi said it had earlier developed a prototype for a simple front-of-pack warning label in Hindi and English intended to clearly communicate health risks associated with foods high in fat, sugar and salt. The organisation stated that the design follows an evidence-based and consumer-oriented approach and has been shared with the authority along with a scientific paper for consideration.
The group also noted that the Economic Survey 2025–26 has recommended the adoption of front-of-pack warning labels as a public health measure to help consumers make informed dietary choices.
The letter was signed by Arun Gupta, convenor of NAPi, who reiterated the organisation’s commitment to supporting evidence-based food policies that place consumer interest and public health at the centre of regulatory decision-making.

Comments

TRENDING

Bihar’s land at ₹1 per acre for Adani sparks outrage, NAPM calls it crony capitalism

By A Representative   The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has strongly condemned the Bihar government’s decision to lease 1,050 acres of land in Pirpainti, Bhagalpur district, to Adani Power for a 2,400 MW coal-based thermal power project. 

An open letter to PM: Before you forgive, ask for forgiveness

By Martin Macwan*  Respected Prime Minister,  The first step toward true forgiveness is asking for it, and it is out of respect for the Constitution that the title "Honourable" is used for the office of the Prime Minister. Every abuse is "dirty" because almost all abuse is uttered with the conscious intention of publicly humiliating a woman, much like the disrobing of Draupadi in the royal court. This includes remarks like "Jersey Cow," used at public meetings on the Gujarati land of Gandhi and Sardar; comparing a female MP's laughter in India's Parliament to "Surpanakha's laugh"; and using a vulgar address like "Didi O Didi" for a Chief Minister who holds a respected position in a democracy—along with every other such remark. In the 79-year history of independent India, you are better placed than anyone to say which Prime Minister has used such language against women.

"Forcible" tribal eviction: Central India village draws international attention following NGO representation

Government building in Amravan By A Representative A small village of about 200 in Central India, a majority of whose residents is dependent on mining as the main source of livelihood, is all set to become a major focal point, nationally and internationally. Reason: Allegations of refusal of the Madhya Pradesh government to protect them from forcible eviction from their land.