Skip to main content

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta
 
We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.
The tragic beauty is that many of the issues plaguing those at the bottom routinely afflict those higher up as well. But that is a story for another day.
This list could just as easily have been written 30, 20, or even 10 years ago. These challenges have stood like mountains. Generations have grappled with the same set of issues without meaningful change. What has changed are two things: first, people have more money, so they attempt to buy their way out. Second, information flows ceaselessly through technology-enabled devices, making people acutely aware of how miserable they are compared to others.
Growing up in the 1990s, many of us found consolation in believing that China and India were bound by similar constraints due to overpopulation. We were told we were greedy for fantasizing about the standards of the developed world. We were not supposed to compare, as we supposedly belonged to a crowded world. We could dream by watching Bollywood movies shot in the calm pastures of America and Europe, but we were expected to stop short of demanding that life—because of China.
Within a decade or so, that consolation was snatched away brutally. China hosted the Olympics in 2008; we hosted the scandal-ridden Commonwealth Games in 2010. Suddenly, we had no one left to compare ourselves with. We were alone in our material miseries. We were—and I had suspected it all along—slow, full of excuses and self-pity.
We then resorted to commentary on human rights, claiming superiority through democracy. We pointed to China’s poor record on civil liberties and suppression of dissent. There was truth in this—not because Indian liberals said so, but because foreign (read: Western) media echoed the same sentiments. On such matters, Indians trusted Western media implicitly. But even then, no one claimed India was categorically better than China overall. There was always doubt in the minds of ordinary citizens: how could we, or for how long could we, claim superiority on human rights that felt too vague or abstract? Meanwhile, the fight for basic human rights—the ones ordinary people can relate to—remained constant and fierce.
I am no authority qualified to make expert comparisons between India and China on human rights. But I fear we may fare worse than China in the medium to long term on civil liberties, dignity, and equality simply because we remain mired in a quagmire where millions are denied basic rights for decades at a stretch. Signs of this already exist, as Western media now describes India as a backsliding democracy with questionable press freedom and civil liberties. The only difference is that we no longer trust Western media as we once did.
The information flowing through fibre optics has already made us feel miserable. What’s worse is that Indians no longer need to compare themselves with the developed world or with China. The majority can simply look at the lives of privileged Indians and feel more wretched than they actually are.
The maids, drivers, and security guards entering gated communities across India don’t just reach their workplaces—they enter a different world, one they envy, aspire to, and dream about. Meanwhile, the residents of these gated communities scroll past the luxurious lives of those in India’s Camellias and Dahlias, who in turn complain about the chaos surrounding their paradise and compare themselves to the orderliness of Singapore or Dubai.
It seems that citizen rights remain a mirage almost everywhere in India.
To make these rights a reality, Indians are making every effort to purchase public goods. They want to control the quality of their lives through money: drinking water, breathable air, reliable transportation, quality healthcare, privileged education, personal security—you name it, and Indians are scrambling to buy it. They neither want to burden nor trust governments with the essentials of their lives.
Public goods—once a beautiful concept taught in economics classrooms—have become private luxuries in India, nothing more.
This phenomenon of buying out one’s rights opens up disturbing possibilities for more and more human rights to be put on sale. We may end up making our society more humane simply by commodifying abstract human rights. And perhaps, in that strange future, we might finally claim superiority over China.
---
Vikas Gupta is a disabled entrepreneur representing himself in a landmark writ petition before the Delhi High Court. His case highlights serious abuse and neglect of disabled persons by multiple state agencies, including Delhi Police, Tihar Jail, and key central ministries. The petition—one of India’s largest disability rights cases to date—seeks accountability, compensation, and systemic reform to uphold human dignity in India’s law enforcement and justice systems

Comments

TRENDING

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...