Skip to main content

Punjab farmers' rally asks people not to harbour illusions from political parties

By Harsh Thakor* 
On May 26th, tens of thousands people of Punjab converged at the Barnala grain market for what was called Lok Sangram rally. Around 24 organisations participated, encompassing peasants, agricultural labourers, industrial workers, students, government employees, unemployed teachers and women. People flooded in large numbers from across the state, with most of them coming from Barnala Sangrur, Patiala, Mansa, Bathinda and Ludhiana, which are nearby.
The principal organiser of the rally was the Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) Ugrahan, claiming to be the state’s largest farmer union, while other organisations included the Punjab Khet Mazdoor Union, Democratic Teachers Front, Punjab Students Union (Randhawa), Powercom and Transco Contract Employees Union, Water and Sanitation Contract Employees' Union, Forest Mazdoor Union and the Bhakra Beas Management Board Workers Union, Nangal.
The rally called on the people not to harbour any aspirations from political parties and relentlessly tread the path of struggle to achieve their goals. The conference affirmed that all major political parties be it the BJP, Congress, Shiromani Akali Dal, or the Aam Aadmi Party, had  stooped to any depths to win power, and their agenda was akin and danced to the very tune of the ruling classes. The organisers did not propose anyone to vote for any political party.
The organisers published and projected a 30-point agenda, the main points of which are to abolish outsourcing in government offices, employment for all, revival of old pension scheme in place of the new one, scrapping the 2020 electricity amendment Bill, legal guarantees for minimum support prices, m withdrawal from the World Trade Organisation, scrapping of the 2020 national education policy, work throughout the year for agricultural labourers as well as construction workers and sweepers, eight hour work day for all categories of workers, abolition of contract labour system, and release of all political prisoners framed under false charges.
What demarcated the rally from others  was, it refrained from call for boycott or support any candidates. It resurrected the trend of similar conferences of the same organisations during the elections of 2012, 2017, 2019 and 2022.
The rally was in sharp contrast to Maoist organisations like Lok Sangram Manch which sought active boycott of elections  in regions like Sangrur, where it carried propaganda to this effect, or the Inquilabi Kendra, which called on people to press None of the Above (NOTA) button, or  CPI(ML) New Democracy and Zameen Prapt Sangharsh Commitee, which also pursued a similar line.
The Punjab state committee of the Communist party Re-Organisation Centre of India (Marxist-Leninist) published a 16 page pamphlet, distributed at the rally, where it summarised how fascism was a phenomenon of the ruling class politics, and it was eclectic to call for principally defeating BJP. It explained why today both tactics of participation and boycott were ineffective, and called for mass political campaign, which would enable people to rise up and organise.
A major theme of the conference was that it is not just the BJP but the very repressive or autocratic nature of the ruling class parliamentary machinery or politics that bred fascism. Speakers summarised that fascism was an overall attack of the ruling classes.
Speakers did not give a call for defeating BJP-RSS, or support INDIA, yet condemned the agenda and policies of the BJP, touching on its  diversionary issues like Ram Mandir. This was also in sharp  contrast with the Samyukt Kisan Morcha directly calling for the defeat of BJP.
BKU (Ugrahan) leader Jhanda Singh Jethuke in detail projected the nefarious games played by ruling class parties to divert people from their burning issues and the basic futility of the parliamentary democratic system. In his speech he illustrated how parliamentary institutions were organs of the ruling classes and not true democratic institutions and how the parliament serves democracy of the oppressor classes.
He called on the people to build parallel democratic institutions. He advocated abolition of corporate,foreign capital and equitable land distribution. In his view only through struggles could any progressive development road occur.
He revealed how fundamentally the electoral system only protected the exploiter classes and why it was imperative for the people to build their own struggles and organisations.
The rally was in sharp contrast to Maoist organisations like Lok Sangram Manch which sought active boycott of elections
BKU president Joginder Singh Ugrahan narrated how the ruling class parties negated the 30 point farmers' agenda and tricked the people that they were implementing that agenda. He told people not to repose any faith on any of the political parties.
Ugrahan summarised why parliamentary elections led people to diversionary path and parliamentary path crushed mass struggles. He explained how real issues had to be raised of the people.
In the view of Ugrahan, the BKU(Ugrahan) had become powerful and played a positive role only because it rejected parliamentary politics. This saved the organisation.  He said, parties like Congress and Aam Admi Party were in essence no different from BJP, and varied only in form. He gave concrete examples of national chauvinism of AAP and Congress.
A significant trend of the conference was the participation of trade union leaders representing the urban factory workers. They struck the point of the dictonomy with what the rulers promised and how in practice it varied by 360 degrees. Union leaders projected how workers were alienated as never before by the economic policies, which virtually shattered the backbone of any real rights. Aspect of worker-peasant unity was highlighted, which is vital to construct a mass revolutionary movement.
BKU (Ugrahan) women’s wing leader Sukhdev Singh Kokrikalan explained how women were targeted by social fascism and how the social system subjected them to social bondage. 
“After every five years, people elect governments at the Centre and in states. But do these governments fulfil the demands of the masses? For that one has to struggle. So we always struggle,” she said. 
Teachers' leader Digvijay Pal Sharma said, “I got recruited in the education department in 2005 under the new pension scheme, and for years we have been struggling to get the old pension scheme reinstated. Four Lok Sabha and Assembly polls have taken place since then but our demand hasn’t been fulfilled. So what are we expecting from these leaders and the governments? Once in power, they are pro-corporate and never take decisions for a welfare state. The entire democratic set-up raises a question mark. For example, Arun Jaitley lost the 2014 Lok Sabha election in Amritsar but he was made a Union minister. Similar was the case with Smriti Irani. So what is the role of an election in this country?”
Lachhman Singh Sewewala, general secretary of the Punjab Khet Mazdoor Union, said, “If we look at the present elections, in Punjab alone nine MLAs are contesting the polls. Five of them are AAP ministers, and the rest are also AAP MLAs. Three are Congress MLAs. If any of these win, there will be bypolls in Punjab. So who will bear the cost of this poll? Politicians organise elections as per their convenience and not after thinking about the budget involved in bypolls. In that scenario, struggles are the only way to get our demands fulfilled.”
An apparent weakness of the rally was sparse presence of the youth, with no representation by the youth organisation Naujwan Bharat Sabha. Also, there was  minimal participation from regions like Amritsar, Jalandhar and Gurdaspur. Then there was insufficient presence of Dalit agricultural labourers, so vital in building a mass movement.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan*    The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.