Skip to main content

'Wrong direction': Paris NGO regrets MNC ArcelorMittal still using coal-based steel

By Rajiv Shah 
A new report by Paris-based non-governmental research and campaigning organization, Reclaim Finance, has blamed the MNC ArcelorMittal – formed in 2006 following the takeover and merger of the western European steel maker Arcelor (Spain, France, and Luxembourg) by Indian-owned Mittal Steel – for using use “climate destructive” metallurgical coal for its projects in India.
In its report, “Steeling Our Future: The banks propping up coal-based steel”, the NGO, a winner of the Goldman Environmental Prize, says, ArcelorMittal, which is the second largest steel producer in the world, is also one of “largest and most polluting” steel producers, too. Yet, it regrets, the world’s major banks continue to support its projects.
Stating that “continuing to finance the production of steel from coal is both a climatic and a financial risk”, the report regrets that banks continue supporting use of coal in steel projects, despite the fact that the “demand for carbon-free steel is growing and technologies are becoming increasingly competitive”, and “the production of carbon-free steel, particularly from green hydrogen, is a real opportunity for banks.”
Believes Reclaim Finance, the adoption of policies is even more urgent, given that ArcelorMittal announced in 2024 investments to “decarbonize its Dunkirk site with the help of the French government”. It did this even as it “produces 70% of its steel from blast furnaces using coal”, including in its projects in India. Ironically, it has “only 1.2% of its capacity in the country of its headquarters, Luxembourg.”
Offering example of ArcelorMittal’s recent joint venture with the Japanese MNC Nippon Steel in India, the report notes, “With a combined capacity of 176 Mtpa, ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel are two of the world’s biggest steelmakers. Together they have entered a joint venture in the Indian steel sector, AM/NS India, to take advantage of rapidly growing demand.”
However, the report regrets, “While ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel present themselves as decarbonization leaders, they continue to build and expand new coal-fired blast furnaces, at odds with their respective commitments to reach net zero by 2050”. It adds, “ArcelorMittal is in fact pursuing a two-speed decarbonization strategy, by investing in innovative and cleaner technologies in Europe and Canada, while building new coal-fired blast furnaces in India.”
According to the report, the expansion plans of the two companies in India “include two additional blast furnaces that will become operational in 2025 and 2026, and an upgrade of an existing blast furnace from 2 Mtpa to 3 Mtpa” – both of which “are considerably at odds with climate imperatives.”
“Additionally”, it asserts, “ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel are planning two new production sites located in Odisha – one of 24 Mtpa, the other 7 Mpta – and the companies have entered a memorandum of understanding to further expand the Hazira steel plant by 2030 to bring total production capacity there to 24 Mtpa.” 
“While technologies have not been disclosed yet, the company’s last expansion plans were coal-based, which raises concerns about their next technology choices”, underlines the report.
The report note, on one hand, ArcelorMittal is “part of several leading initiatives on steel decarbonization, including the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), the Mission Possible Partnership, and the Responsible Steel Initiative”, thus using its “leading position to bring about meaningful change”. But on the other, “it continues to head in the wrong direction by extending its coal dependency.”
The company’s public declarations claim it is committed to Paris-aligned objectives, but its lobbying practices are a cause for concern
“Furthermore”, the report states, “Although the company’s public declarations claim it is committed to Paris-aligned objectives, its lobbying practices are a cause for concern.” Thus, “ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel were among the 25 most influential companies blocking climate policy action globally, according to the independent think tank InfluenceMap in its 2022 ‘Corporate Climate Policy Footprint’ report.”
Further, it says, “ArcelorMittal is also a member of two of the top ten most negative and influential industry associations: BusinessEurope (fourth) and the Federation of German Industries (tenth.” In fact, the company “has a D+ grade on InfluenceMap’s platform LobbyMap – the rating goes from A+ to F and measures a company’s climate policy engagement, with grades D to F indicating increasingly obstructive climate policy engagement." For example, it adds, "ArcelorMittal has actively lobbied against EU climate regulations, such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the EU Emissions Trading System reform.”
Accusing ArcelorMittal of “human rights and pollution violations”, the report says, the company’s “track record is disastrous...” It has “been found guilty and fined in several instances, including in Ukraine, France, India, the US, Liberia and Canada.”
“More recently, the deadliest accident in Kazakhstan’s post-Soviet history occurred at ArcelorMittal’s metallurgical coal mine, where a methane explosion killed 46 people. This is the latest in a list of over 180 fatalities and numerous severe injuries at the company’s mining operations in Kazakhstan since their establishment in 1995”, it notes.
“In light of all these elements, financiers of ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel should question their expansion plans and technology choices. The two companies must be required to adopt comprehensive climate strategies across all geographies”, the report insists, noting, “In March 2023, ArcelorMittal benefited from a US$5 billion loan involving Japanese bansk Mizuho Financial, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust and SMBC, all of whom have “have not adopted decarbonization targets.”
Other banks which funded ArcelorMittal recently, the report says, are BNP Paribas, ING, Société Générale and UniCredit, which together granted a US$2.2 billion revolving credit facility, with a book ratio of US$156 million each, in September 2022, even though the company “till plans to continue developing blast furnaces and to extend the life of existing furnaces”.
“This runs counter to the projections of the International Energy Agency, which states in its Net Zero Emissions scenario that to achieve net zero, emissions from the steel sector must be reduced by 90% by 2050, meaning there is an urgent need to produce steel without fossil fuels”, it thinks.

Comments

Anonymous said…
What is the alternative to coal for India ? Even lignite which was to be phased out as a fuel is still being merrily burnt .
BP said…
Good story. Unmindful of environmental hazards, banks may continue to fund such coal-based projects to enhance and sustain their banking business. And such industrial projects may continue to flourish until Adani remains into coal business in a big way.

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...