Skip to main content

UGC mandating NET qualification for PhD entrance disastrous for marginalised sections

The All-India Democratic Students Organisation statement denouncing the UGC notice, dated 27.03.2024, mandating NET qualification for PhD entrance from the academic year 2024-25 onwards:
***
We are dismayed by the UGC circular that essentially mandates the universities and higher education institutions to adopt NET score as the sole criteria for PhD interview. The government, hell bent on imposing the deplorable NEP 2020, and on submitting the interests of education and research at the feet of national and international education mafia, has chosen to ignore the persistent voice of the stakeholders and members of the public before taking this disastrous decision.
Despite all shortcomings, the public funded institutions including universities have functioned with an aim to provide an opportunity for the marginalised section to get education. While the founding principles may have been watered down over the years, it cannot be denied that many scholars belonging to different underprivileged sections (based on income, religion, caste, region, language, gender, physical ability etc.) have had access to quality education because the universities have defined measures to diminish the adverse effects of all these differences on their education. Even though there is a huge unwelcoming disparity in fellowships among NET-JRF and university RET scholars, once a scholar overcomes all the hurdles to receive a PhD degree, he or she is treated nearly at par with any other scholar. This will no longer be so.
Making NET mandatory will summarily eliminate several aspirants as they cannot access the expensive coaching industry which has now become an essential gateway for NET. The online and MCQ mode of the examination will certainly add to the count of those eliminated. Further, the notification creates three categories of NET qualification, of which only those qualified for JRF are eligible for fellowship. This only serves to legitimise and accentuate discrimination among scholars. It is very clear that the ruling class will do everything to curtail the highly educated workforce and alienate the student community from vibrant research. This is exactly what would happen through this UGC directive.
AIDSO strongly condemns this sinister move. We call upon all students and well meaning people to rise in unison, foil the destructive ploy and compel the government to take back this directive immediately and provide robust funding, infrastructure and equitable fellowship for research.
--- Rimmi Vaghela, Secretary, Gujarat State Committee, AIDSO

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.