Skip to main content

'Repeal AFSPA': European Parliament blames Manipur violence on Hindu majoritarianism

Counterview News     
In an unprecedented move, the European Parliament has passed a resolution blaming intolerance towards religious and belief minorities, including Christians; politically motivated, divisive policies promoting Hindu majoritarianism; increase in activity by militant groups; and partisan involvement by security forces for the ongoing violence in Manipur.
Pointing out that the “violent clashes” between the Meitei and Kuki ethnic communities in Manipur since 3 May 2023 have left at least 120 people dead and 50,000 displaced, destroying over 1,700 houses, over 250 churches and several temples and schools, the resolution says all this has “increased distrust in the authorities.”
Noting that imposition a curfew, shoot-on-sight orders and internet shut down have severely hindered information-gathering and reporting by the media and civil society groups, the resolution, adopted by show of hands, approvingly quotes the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights for appealing to India to “safeguard the rights of human rights defenders”, while “raising concerns over shrinking space for civil society.”
Urging the Indian authorities to take all necessary measures to “promptly halt” the ongoing ethnic and religious violence, “protect” religious minorities, especially Manipur’s Christian community, in order to “pre-empt any further escalation”, the resolution seeks allowing independent investigations into the violence, while granting “unhindered access to humanitarian aid providers, international observers and journalists.”
Resolution calls for human rights to be integrated into all areas of the EU-India partnership, including trade
Denouncing in “the strongest terms any nationalistic rhetoric” and asking those who are critical of the government’s conduct not be criminalised, it insists on Central government, all political actors and religious leaders “to take urgent steps to restore calm and ensure an inclusive dialogue involving civil society and the affected communities.”
Calling on the Central government to repeal the “unlawful” Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) in line with the recommendations of the UN Universal Periodic Review, even as abiding by “the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials”, the resolution calls for human rights “to be integrated into all areas of the EU-India partnership, including trade.”
Asking all the EU member states to “systematically and publicly raise human rights concerns with India at the highest level, particularly regarding freedom of expression and religion and the shrinking space for civil society”, it seeks “regular dialogue to be organised between the European Parliament and the Parliament of India” for this.

Comments

TRENDING

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.