Skip to main content

Why big fuss about special issue on Savarkar? None cared for 'real' Gandhi till now

By Prem Singh* 

Some Gandhians appear to be indignant about the special issue of 'Antim Jan' on Sarvakar. It is a monthly magazine published by a government organization, Gandhi Darshan and Smriti. Some journalists, intellectuals and party spokespersons/ leaders too have expressed their unhappiness over the special issue. Gandhi's great-grandson Tushar Gandhi's statement has also reacted to it.
'Gandhi Darshan and Smriti' is an organization related to the life and thoughts of Gandhi. Opponents believe that this institution's special issue on Savarkar is part of the 'Hindutva' agenda of the present government. They say that by doing so the government has tried to distort Gandhi's philosophy and reduce his stature.
Gandhi received recognition due to his life, his role in Indian politics, and his philosophy based on his beliefs. This was evident on the amphitheatre of India and the world. Even after he was gone, Gandhi's stature has remained unchallenged in the world. The reason behind this is his life and philosophy.
Indeed, Gandhi's leadership in the decisive phase of the Indian independence movement, has emerged as an illustration and an ideal in the history of human civilization. His role and philosophy are reflected on the thought patterns of the entire human civilization.
This is why Einstein said that generations to come would hardly believe that such a man made of flesh and blood ever existed on earth. It would be important to note that the great scientist Einstein, who considered Gandhi the most significant leader among all the world leaders, never had a personal meeting with Gandhi.
The history of human civilization should not be a chain of times based on human tendencies such as falsehood, violence, hatred, deceit, cowardice, conspiracy, malice, animosity, greed, and so on. Humanity therefore needs Gandhi – in order to maintain truth, non-violence and love at the root of life.
If, due to merely the misplaced efforts of some people with limited understanding, Gandhi's philosophy could possibly be distorted and his stature reduced, then his life and impact could not have left an undeniable mark on the history of human civilization.
Those who are concerned about the distortion of Gandhi's philosophy and attempts to belittle his stature, should make themselves good Gandhians before questioning the activities of their opponents. Only then the existence of Gandhi will find true permanence.
Gandhi did not consider opponents as his enemies even if they came to support the British and oppose the freedom movement. He had human feelings even for the British, who subjugated India because he had a new perspective to fight his opponents.
Attempts have been made in India in the past to make Gandhi stand out in comparison to other personalities. Some weigh him with Bhagat Singh, some with Ambedkar, some with Jinnah, some with Karl Marx, some with Mao.
Gandhi was not needed by Nehru, Patel or Maulana, but his relevance did not reduce even slightly
Despite all this, Gandhi remains the same, because of his role and philosophy. The same is the case with those people, by comparison, who make attempts to reduce the stature of Gandhi. The basic point is that Gandhi's role and philosophy cannot be undone by any government, party, or individual effort.
Modern industrial civilization is trapped in a vicious cycle of violence, counter -violence and acute indulgence with consumerism. The crisis of human civilization is spread everywhere - earth, sea and space. Millions of species of animals and plants have become extinct amidst voluptuousness of greed and material ambition. India itself is badly in the grip of this civilization.
Gandhi, especially in the midst of the horrors of Partition, himself felt that anti-humanity had won in spite of his best efforts to avoid it. But his faith in humanity was not shaken. He admitted:
"Whenever I am disappointed, I remember that truth and love have always triumphed in history. There were tyrants and murderers and for some time they also seemed to be invincible, but in the end, they were defeated ... Always remember this thing."
If we make a genuine effort, the relevance of Gandhi's existence will remain strong in spite of the false narratives. It is not necessary that everyone should understand the simple grandeur of Gandhi. But there is no need to get angry or take cudgels against such people. Gandhi was no longer needed by Nehru, Patel and Maulana.
But as we know, even then Gandhi's relevance was not diminished in the slightest manner. Had he not been murdered, he would have lived with the ordinary people of India and Pakistan, or in the jails of independent India and Pakistan while continuing to adhere to his role and philosophy!
The problem is not that the RSS distorts Gandhi. The problem lies with Gandhi's claimants. They can't explain why they need Gandhi. For ‘the last man’? But the truth is that by pushing back Gandhi's last man, they have brought in the 'aam aadmi'.
Their leader sits with pictures of Bhagat Singh and Ambedkar on his both sides. He knows that his ideal party, the RSS/BJP, will one day bring Gandhi down. But the point to realise is that despite even this, Gandhi's relevance will not end. Gandhi is not dependent on institutions and governments.
Why does India need to make a showpiece of Gandhi? If Gandhi is turned into a showpiece, then different leaders and governments will decorate and use him in their own way in the country as well as abroad. The Congress had been doing this very well for a long time.
The need is to follow the example of the real Gandhi. Then he will not be used in favour of Savarkar, nor in favour of corporate capitalism. Amidst the big talk of 'India of Gandhi's dreams', which continued so long, what big crime has the special issue of 'Antim Jan' committed?
---
*Associated with the socialist movement; former teacher at the Delhi University and fellow at the Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla

Comments

  1. The fuss can help inform generations of Indians ignorant of the history culture ideals of the struggle for Independence. Gandhians and others have betrayed so far, and scepticism about that is ok.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

The farmer's burden: How oil, war, and climate are rewriting the price of food

By Vikas Meshram   The scorching flames of the Middle East conflict are now slowly reaching the kitchens of ordinary people. The true price of this war is paid in daily markets, vegetable shops, and in the shattered minds of farmers. Expensive crude oil, skyrocketing fertilizer prices, and rising agricultural costs are together creating the conditions for global food inflation — and this crisis is directly tied to what people eat and drink every day.

India's nuclear euphoria: The hard economics policymakers ignore

By Shankar Sharma*  There is a sort of newfound euphoria sweeping India with respect to nuclear power — and in particular, Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). In political speeches, policy documents, and newspaper editorials, the word "nuclear" has acquired a fresh, almost romantic glow, as though a technology once synonymous with catastrophe at Chernobyl and Fukushima has been quietly reinvented.  To be sure, the challenges of climate change and India's growing electricity demand are real and urgent. But enthusiasm is not a substitute for analysis. A hard look at the global evidence, the domestic cost picture, and the practical hurdles of nuclear deployment raises questions that this national conversation urgently needs to confront.

Beyond the 'silent relocation' narrative in Bangladesh's Chittagong Hill Tracts

By Dr. Mohammad Asaduzzaman*  In recent years, a narrative has emerged from the rugged and forested terrain of the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), portraying the region as the site of a “silent relocation” — a mass forced migration of Bangladesh’s non-Muslim ethnic communities into neighboring India and Myanmar.