Skip to main content

Meghalaya: Demand to release Rs 52 crore for unoganised workers 'pending' for a year

By A Representative

Taking serious note of the failure of the Maghalaya government's refusal for a year to ensure distribution of the Rs 52 crore promise by it in March 2020 under the Chief Minister’s Relief Against Wage Loss (CRAWL), intended to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on unorganized sector workers, India's civil rights network National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has said it supports social activist Angela Rangad who has been on a protest sit-in at the gates of the Secretariat in Shillong on this.
Part of the Thma u Rangli (TUR) collective, Angela is seeking relief for domestic workers, street vendors, and daily wager workers. An RTI filed by TUR in November 2020 showed irregularities not only in registering the workers entitled to this cash transfer, but also in transferring the promised amount of INR 2,100, corresponding to compensation for three weeks.
"The disbursement of the Rs 5,000 intended for each labourer registered under the Meghalaya Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board (MBOCWWB) is similarly pending and has failed to provide the necessary relief", an NAPM note said, regretting, "The Government of Meghalaya, and Deputy CM and minister in charge for labour Prestone Tynsong have been blatantly refusing to acknowledge any irregularity."
"In spite of prior demands by TUR, and other organizations, the State government has refused to take action and make available the financial assistance that the workers are entitled to. Unsurprisingly, the government is more preoccupied with ensuring the well-being of the rich, leaving the working classes to suffer the impact of loss of livelihood sources and access to food, healthcare and shelter", it adds.
Asking the State government to ensure registration of all unorganized sector workers under CRAWL, and releasing the Rs 2,100 to each immediately, NAPM said, at the same time the government must ensure release of Rs 5,000 to all labourers registered under MBOCWWB.
NAPM also demanded diversion of MLAs' funds should to support the families of unorganized workers, utilisation of 20% of the salaries of Class I officers and tax refunds for IAS and IPS officers to cover out of pocket expenses for Covid-affected working class people, and ensuring 200 person-days work under NREGA annually across Meghalaya, with Rs 600 as the per day wage.

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.