Need of the hour is to leave the nitty-gritty of the country's foreign affairs to professionally trained diplomats

By Rajiv Sharma*

In the most deplorable attack that has shaken every Indian, Pakistan sponsored terrorists killed 17 soldiers of Indian Army and injured more than 30 in Uri in Kashmir today. Modi has made a routine statement that those behind the attack will not go unpunished. Others have also condemned strongly. But the question that demands immediate answer is that how Pakistan could dare to unleash such a big attack on our Army?
It is said when a country has a weak government, its security forces have to pay the price.
Modi government's umpteen flip flops in foreign policy issues are in public domain by now. While dealing with Pakistan, the government began with inviting Sharif to Modi's oath taking ceremony in May 2014. In just two months, this positive gesture was followed by a self-defeating decision to abruptly call off talks with Pakistan on Hurriyat issue. But then flip flops had to continue. The government suddenly relented after a few months and agreed to talk to Pakistan one fine morning. They did so even when Pakistan did not budge an inch on Hurriyat. This could not have strengthened India’s position vis a vis Pakistan among international community.
Then, Modi's unplanned visit to meet Nawaz Sharif to celebrate his birthday, even when he was not invited there, did not prove to be to India's advantage. It is reported that Modi went to the extent of touching feet of mother of Nawaz Sharif. Pakistani media profusely reported it with uncontrolled glee. Only the current PM of India knows significance of such a gesture in international diplomacy.
Further, whenever India was stung by Pakistan’s nefarious designs, Modi government would call Pakistan 'a fountainhead of world terrorism'. But then surprise of the surprises, the same government sent an invitation to infamous ISI of Pakistan to visit India's strategically sensitive Pathankot Airforce base to investigate a terrorist attack where 7 of our Jawans were killed. While doing so the government just forgot that the Pakistan airbase attack was sponsored by the same ISI of Pakistan, which would now investigate it.
Even today, it is difficult to comprehend the reasons which forced Modi government to invite ISI to stay in a sensitive airbase near Indo Pak border and investigate a terrorist act perpetrated on Indian soil. It not only allowed Pakistan’s dreaded intelligence agency to have a look at vital Indian defence establishment but also give itself a clean chit for a terrorist act it had masterminded itself. This one act of Modi government gave huge legitimacy to Pakistan to regain some of its position in world affairs, it had lost after 26/11 Mumbai attack. Now when Modi Saheb and his ministers call Pakistan a rogue or a terrorist state, there are not many international voices which echo India's position. But is it surprising, given such glaring flip flops?.
Furthermore, Modi government helplessly watched Pakistan derail 26/11 judicial process to fix handlers of Mumbai attack. So much so, it never talks about punishing 26/11 perpetrators now.
Enough damage has already been done. It is high time now that the government goes for a course correction immediately to improve its handling of foreign affairs. The need of the hour is to leave the nitty-gritty of the foreign affairs to professionally trained diplomats of ministry of External affairs within the broad policy frame work of the government.

---

*Source: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1097015583715159&id=100002201844417

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Search This Blog