Skip to main content

Indian mission told to follow Aussie laws: Sydney consulate fined $10,620 for "unfair" dismissal of employee

Sydney Consul general
By A Representative
In what is being interpreted by the Indian diaspora across Australia as “not a very bright event” for the community, the Indian consulate in Sydney has been fined $10,620 over “unfair dismissal” of an employee, who claims to be a whistleblower, Hitendra Kumar, an immigrant working with it as a driver.
A report published in the “South Asia Times (SAT)” (June 2016), a periodical published from Melbourne, Australia, has said that after Kumar’s employment was terminated, he challenged “the unfair dismissal” in the Fair Work Commission court.
Talking about what went wrong, Kumar has been quoted as saying, “When I began to highlight serious issues and discrepancies in what was going on at the consulate, I was sacked on a trumped up charge. I’m delighted that I’ve been vindicated by the Courts.”
The judgement went in favour of the employee after the consulate put up stiff resistance despite the court providing the option for an out-of-course settlement, which could have “saved a lot of money and embarrassment and litigation for the consulate.”
Based on documents obtained by Ashok Kumar of the “Indian Subcontinent Times, Sidney, the report said, the consulate “opted to go ahead with the court with proceedings and thereby incurring three times the cost and ended up paying 12 weeks’ salary $10,620.”
Ashok Kumar
“The consulate ignored the fact that working laws are different in Australia than in India and it had to follow Australian procedures when dealing with any Australian citizen or permanent resident as the employee of the consulate”, the report said.
The report quoted Transport Workers’ Union acting secretary Richard Olsen welcoming the decision by the Fair Work Commission to award a driver “unfairly” dismissed by the Indian consulate, saying that it would send “a clear message that no employer is above the law.”
Olsen said, “This decision sends a message to all workers in Australia, especially foreign migrants, that you have rights no matter who your boss is or what they tell you. It also sends a message to employers that even if you have diplomatic immunity, you still have to play by Australian workplace laws.”
He further said, “There are systematic problems with the exploitation of foreign workers in Australia”, adding, “From 7-Eleven, the transport industry and all the way up to foreign embassies, we have seen foreign migrants underpaid, exploited and sacked by their bosses if they speak up.”

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 14, 2016

    Discuss the actual case's details mate rather than beating around the bush or at least give the link to the case order itself.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.