Skip to main content

Gujarat CM wants CSR funds in state coffers, officials say it's just not possible

By Rajiv Shah 
Contradicting the recent announcement by Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel, declaring that April 2015 onwards state-based enterprises will have to transfer two per cent of their profits towards the corporate social responsibility (CSR) fund of the Gujarat government, a top state insider said this is “simply not possible”. The insider, requesting anonymity, said, there is “no law in the state or India which makes it obligatory for the companies to hand over CSR funds to the government. The corporates will not agree as it is as it is against their interest.”
Patel made the announcement at Elkala village in Umbergaon taluka in South Gujarat two days back while inaugurating the Asian Aerosoal Company’s new plant. She said, the state government would be utilizing the CSR funds received from the corporate houses to build toilets across the state and the automatic midday meal making plants, which would supply cooked food to primary schools.
The insider said, “There is just one law in the country on CSR, promulgated by the Government of India. It mandates that companies to utilize two per cent of their net profits to charitable causes, and leaves it to the corporate houses where they should spend them. The state has no role in this, nor can it have.”
He added, “A massive 294-page Act, it requires companies to set up a CSR board committee, allocate two per cent of net profits in the last three years to CSR. It requires a review at the end of each financial year by the board’s director to ensure compliance. It is not clear what does Gujarat chief minister have in mind when she says the two per cent funds would be transferred to the government.”
The law applies to the registered companies registered with a net worth of Rs 5 billion and a turnover of Rs 10 billion, or net profit that exceeds Rs 50 million. An estimated about 8,000 Indian companies meet this definition, which would equate to Rs 12,000-15,000 crore annually in giving. Currently, such giant companies such as Wipro, Reliance, Tata, and Airtel have foundations and partake in CSR activities.
A senior Gujarat government official said, “Corporate houses operating in Gujarat will not be willing as the income tax law does not allow tax exemption if the funds are transferred the state government. Industry sources added, no major company would allow its funds to be transferred to the state government. “We want the funds to be utilized as we like”, an industry representative pointed out.
Patel’s predecessor, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, tried this ahead of the Vibrant Gujarat investment summit in 2009 with private industrial houses, but miserably failed. Tens of memorandums of understanding (MoUs) on CRS were signed up with the corporates participating at the summit. Some of those who “agreed” included Reliance, Tatas, Maruti, Satyam, Adanis, Asima, Ambuja, Apollo Hospital and Rai Schools Group.
While they agreed to enter into public-private partnership with the state government to take up projects on education, health and tribal development for CSR, none of them parted with two per cent of their profits.
Earlier plans, worked out in 2008 to rope in major industrial houses operating in Gujarat to contribute funds for social causes. This was done close on the heels of state public sector enterprises (PSEs) having been asked to contribute a third of their profit before tax (PBT) to the state-sponsored Gujarat Socio-Economic Development Society (GSEDS).
At that time, several of IAS officials, working as state PSU chiefs opposed transfer of profits to the state government. These included Sudha Anchalia, CMD of the Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertiliser Corporation (GNFC), and VL Joshi, MD, Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation. They expressed their view in front of the then chief secretary D Rajagopalan.

Comments

  1. CSR Scheme of Companies Act 2013 - Financial Fraud involving Corporates and Politicians - be Abolished to Stop Misuse of Investors' Money as also Public Money.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Beyond the 'silent relocation' narrative in Bangladesh's Chittagong Hill Tracts

By Dr. Mohammad Asaduzzaman*  In recent years, a narrative has emerged from the rugged and forested terrain of the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), portraying the region as the site of a “silent relocation” — a mass forced migration of Bangladesh’s non-Muslim ethnic communities into neighboring India and Myanmar.

The farmer's burden: How oil, war, and climate are rewriting the price of food

By Vikas Meshram   The scorching flames of the Middle East conflict are now slowly reaching the kitchens of ordinary people. The true price of this war is paid in daily markets, vegetable shops, and in the shattered minds of farmers. Expensive crude oil, skyrocketing fertilizer prices, and rising agricultural costs are together creating the conditions for global food inflation — and this crisis is directly tied to what people eat and drink every day.

Ram, Bam and Bengal: Memories of a Left turn toward the Right

By Rajiv Shah   The BJP ’s massive electoral win in West Bengal is being interpreted across political persuasions — except, of course, by the BJP itself — as the result of the alleged deletion of around 90 lakh voters from the electoral rolls during the controversial intensive revision process. This may well be true, given my own experience in Gujarat regarding the shoddy manner in which electoral revisions have often been conducted. In West Bengal, there also appeared to be a political angle to the exercise. But I am not interested in discussing that here, as enough has already appeared in the media on the subject.