Skip to main content

Villagers oppose Gujarat government "decision" to acquire their land off Narmada for tourism purpose

The protest meeting
By A Representative
Fearing forcible acquisition of land for tourism purpose, a villagers’ meeting near Kevadia colony, the site of the Narmada dam, has taken the pledge that they would not part with their “land, forest and river”, sought to be “snatched away by the state and the authority”. The pledge, taken on the 114th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi on the bank of the river Narmada, added, “We the working people collectively resolve that the forest, land, and the river are a lifeline for us which are our heritage handed down to us by our ancestors. It is our duty to protect our heritage for which we have organized ourselves. The state and authority want to snatch away our land, forest and river in the name of development.”
The meeting took place against the backdrop of the Gujarat government’s strongly-worded letter to sarpanches of 50-odd villages to either comply by its decision to include their land as part of the Kevadia Area Development Authority’s (KADA’s) plan to convert the area around the Narmada dam into a high-profile tourism spot or face consequences. The letter was written in March 2013 by the chief executive officer of KADA, which comes directly under the state urban development department.
On October 1, the state government tried to do some damage control exercise ahead of the villagers’ meeting, which took place on at Indravarna village. The officials, who called sarpanches of these villages, told the sarpanches called for an urgent get-together at Shoolpaneshwar temple on Narmada river’s bank, that they wanted to clear some “misapprehensions.” However, as the sarpanches failed to get a satisfactory answer, the villagers continued with their meeting.
Moderated by Narendrabhai with Rameshbhai from Indravarna village, Nareshbhai Tadvi from Kevadia, Rameshbhai Tadvi from Khadagda, Ranchodbhai from Sakva, Ansuyaben and Dhakalbhai from
Dharmapur, Dakshaben Tadvi from Pichipura, Lakhan Mussafir, the meeting was attended by several activists, including Aditi Chanchani, a researcher with Equations, which is an NGO which works on tourism issues and social impact assessment; Rajesh Mishra of Arch-Vahini, which is working among tribals of the area; and Badribhai Joshi, an eminent Gandhian fighting for farmer's rights.
Policemen stop people from going to the meeting
Representatives from other NGOs which were present on the occasion were Gujarat Sarvodaya Mandal, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Sahiyar, Jyoti Karmachari Mandal, People's Union for Civil Liberties, people from Dangs and Manviya Technology Forum.
A statement issued at the end of the meeting said, “The speakers raised various issues linked to how can we trust the government to do justice to 70 villages when the issue of the six villages since 1961 remain unresolved.” The reference was to the six villagers whose land was taken away to build the Narmada dam. Of the 70 villagers, 16 are such which have already been included in KADA, while the rest are allegedly facing the “threat” from KADA.
The statement quoted the villagers as saying that they do not want their children to work as labourers in hotels and their womenfolk to be involve in sex work – “these along with other concerns were raised on the nature of tourism that these developments will bring with it.” Especially taking strong exception to a huge police force called at the meeting venue, the statement said, “The progressive people and organizations of Gujarat should ask a question to the state machinery was the police force mobilized for law and order or create terror and threat among people to suppress their concerns.”
It added, “A huge police force of men and women was mobilized by the state to create an atmosphere of terror and threat among the villagers to prevent them from reaching the place of the meeting where they were to discuss and raise their grievances against KADA. Even photographs and video was taken of the villagers who were on their way to the venue of the meeting to scare them. When people are ready for a dialogue with the authority, why are the voices now being suppressed?”
The statement further said, “On October 1, 2013, the district collector and KADA authorities organized an urgent meeting with sarpanches, panchayat members and the talatis (lowest level revenue officials) to indirectly communicate to the people not to join the meeting. In spite of these efforts by the state and KADA authority, over 1200 people from the villages attended the meeting and resolved to fight back this inhuman and unconstitutional action.”
The statement regretted that though chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd, chairman and CEO of KADA, and the Narmada district collector were invited for a dialogue at the meeting in order to present their views before the villagers, the authorities reacted with police force being sent on the spot of the meeting. “We regret to state that they chose to remain absent from the meeting, which is unfortunate”, it added.

Comments

TRENDING

From algorithms to exploitation: New report exposes plight of India's gig workers

By Jag Jivan   The recent report, "State of Finance in India Report 2024-25," released by a coalition including the Centre for Financial Accountability, Focus on the Global South, and other organizations, paints a stark picture of India's burgeoning digital economy, particularly highlighting the exploitation faced by gig workers on platform-based services. 

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Over 40% of gig workers earn below ₹15,000 a month: Economic Survey

By A Representative   The Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, while reviewing the Economic Survey in Parliament on Tuesday, highlighted the rapid growth of gig and platform workers in India. According to the Survey, the number of gig workers has increased from 7.7 million to around 12 million, marking a growth of about 55 percent. Their share in the overall workforce is projected to rise from 2 percent to 6.7 percent, with gig workers expected to contribute approximately ₹2.35 lakh crore to the GDP by 2030. The Survey also noted that over 40 percent of gig workers earn less than ₹15,000 per month.

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Budget 2026 focuses on pharma and medical tourism, overlooks public health needs: JSAI

By A Representative   Jan Swasthya Abhiyan India (JSAI) has criticised the Union Budget 2026, stating that it overlooks core public health needs while prioritising the pharmaceutical industry, private healthcare, medical tourism, public-private partnerships, and exports related to AYUSH systems. In a press note issued from New Delhi, the public health network said that primary healthcare services and public health infrastructure continue to remain underfunded despite repeated policy assurances.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Death behind locked doors in East Kolkata: A fire that exposed systemic neglect

By Atanu Roy*  It was Sunday at midnight. Around 30 migrant workers were in deep sleep after a hard day’s work. A devastating fire engulfed the godown where they were sleeping. There was no escape route for the workers, as the door was locked and no firefighting system was installed. Rules of the land were violated as usual. The fire continued for days, despite the sincere efforts of fire brigade personnel. The bodies were charred in the intense heat and were beyond identification, not fit for immediate forensic examination. As a result, nobody knows the exact death toll; estimates are hovering around 21 as of now.

When compassion turns lethal: Euthanasia and the fear of becoming a burden

By Deepika   A 55-year-old acquaintance passed away recently after a long battle with cancer. Why so many people are dying relatively young is a question being raised in several forums, and that debate is best reserved for another day. This individual was kept on a ventilator for nearly five months, after which the doctors and the family finally decided to let go. The cost of keeping a person on life support for such extended periods is enormous. Yet families continue to spend vast sums even when the chances of survival are minimal. Life, we are told, is precious, and nature itself strives to protect and sustain it.