Skip to main content

Non-committal on demands, Gujarat govt gets assurance that Modi's "iron rally" will not be disturbed

October 2 protest rally
By A Representative
Representatives of Narmada project affected persons belonging to tens of villages surrounding the Kevadia colony, the spot where the Narmada dam is situated, returned from Gandhinagar without getting any concrete assurance about their main demand – not to turn the entire region into a tourism spot by acquiring their land. A statement issued on behalf of the affected persons soon after the meeting, which took place in the state Capital in the afternoon, said, “The Gujarat government for the first time agreed that there was a problem and there should be negotiations. However, it refused to give any assurance.”
As many as 145 representatives from 70 villages, which face the danger of losing their land for the tourism project around Kevadia, met Cabinet ministers of the Modi government, including finance minister Nitin Patel, revenue minister Anandiben Patel and tribal and forest minister Ganpat Vasava. The talks, which took place in the presence of Narmada district collector Rakesh Shankar, ended after the ministers succeeded in getting a promise from the representatives that they would not disturb Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi’s proposed rally off Narmada dam, which is to take place on October 31, the birth anniversary of Sardar Patel.
Modi’s rally is being organised with the declared intention to “collect” iron from farmers around the country to “build” the highest 182-metre statue of the world – Statue of Unity – in the memory of Sardar Patel. Senior IAS bureaucrats have been dispatched to different parts of the country to “convince” farmers to come with iron for the statue. Insiders, however, say that the state government will not be using the iron for the statue as it is “technically not feasible. The iron will be mostly used for decorations, including railings, around the Statue of Unity, which is proposed to be the central attraction while converting the whole area into a tourist spot.
The meeting took place following a veiled threat by the Kevadia Area Development Authority (KADA) to several of the village panchayats around Kevadia that they should “allow their lands to be used for tourism purpose or face consequences.” A KADA chief executive officer letter to as many as 52 village sarpanches threatened the villagers in these words in March, but later retracted saying his letter was “misunderstood”, calling the sarpanches for a compromise. As the compromise failed, the projected affected villagers held a well-attended meeting off Kevadia on October 2, where it was decided to intensify the stir. This woke up Gandhinagar, which called the villagers for negotiations.
During the meeting with the ministers, the representatives gave the following charter of demand:
· The six villages (Kevadia, Vagadia, Kothi, Limbdi, Navagam and Gora), whose land was taken away to build the Narmada dam without any compensation in line with other project affected persons of the Narmada project, should either get back their land or they should be paid compensation according to the Narmada tribunal award.
· Decades ago, the villagers, whose lands were taken away, were told that the acquisition was being done only for the dam, and no other purpose. Since the purpose has been solved and the colony is not needed any more to house officials to implement the project, there is little reason to come up with any other activity like tourism in the region, which is proposed through KADA. In fact, the tourism project should be abandoned.
· Work for the proposed Garudeshwar weir, to be built 12 kilometres downstream of the dam in order to convert the whole area into a huge lake to encourage tourism, should be stopped immediately. The weir, it was pointed out, would affected fishery activities, and no environmental clearance has yet been taken for it, though it is part of the Narmada project.
· There should be an urgent decision to work for giving irrigation water from Narmada and Karjan dams to the villagers surrounding the Kevadia, even if it may mean lifting of the water from Narmada river. Currently, the villagers of the region, which gave away their lands for Narmada and Karjan, are deprived of any water from the two projects.
The representatives who spoke before the ministers were Kalpesh Tadvi, Narendra Tadvi, Vijendra Tadvi, Naresh Tadvi, Chandrakant Tadvi, Bhailal Tadvi, Dakshaben Tadvi, Gemjibhai Tadvi and Ambaben Tadvi, all belonging to the Sitter Gaam Adivasi Sangathan, especially formed to protest against the government’s move to convert the region into a tourism spot. Representatives of the environmental NGO, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Lakhanbhai Musafir and Dipen Desai, were also present on the occasion.

Comments

TRENDING

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.

A fearless spirit lost: Rebecca Thomson dies at 17-hour Catalina Swim Mark

By Harsh Thakor  On July 26, 2026, Rebecca “Becky” Thomson suffered cardiac arrest while attempting the Catalina Channel Swim — a marathon open water crossing from Catalina Island to the California mainland. After swimming for 17 hours, Thomson collapsed in the water. Despite the painstaking efforts of emergency responders and the medical staff at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, she succumbed to a devastating hypoxic brain injury and died Friday evening.

As luxury home prices surge, India’s affordable housing market faces a squeeze

Counterview News     India’s housing market is increasingly showing two very different faces: affluent buyers are driving demand for premium homes, even as the supply of genuinely affordable housing continues to shrink.