Skip to main content

Social, political activists seek 'immediate' nationalisation of healthcare infrastructure

By A Representative 

Several social and political activists, including veteran physician Dr GG Parikh, who participated in 1942 Quit India movement and went to jail; Magsaysay award winning social activist Prof Sandeep Pandey; and socialist thinker Brij Khandelwal, among others, have demanded that the Modi government and all state governments “must immediately nationalize all healthcare infrastructure” in view of the current Covid crisis.
In a statement, they emanded, “All big corporate hospitals, vaccine manufacturing, diagnostics chains and others should be government run; however space should be protected for charitable hospitals and community-run healthcare facilities that can function autonomously (like IITs and IIMs) within the overall government health policy framework.”
Other signatories of the statement include Sheeva Dubey, assistant professor, DY Patil International University, Pune; Praveen Srivastava, faculty (physics), Queens' College, Lucknow; Pannalal Surana, national president, SPI; Dr Lubna Sarwath, Telangana general secretary, SPI; Praveen Srivastava, faculty (physics), Queens' College, Lucknow; and Bobby Ramakant, Central News Service, Asha Parivar, and SPI leader.
Claiming the Modi government has “miserably failed to ensure that private healthcare services are offered to no profit basis at a time when the entire country is reeling under severest form of public health and humanitarian crises”, the statement says, “Rather the government itself has negotiated a maximum price cap for private sector that allows it to earn huge profits.”
The statement insists, “The government should bring the private health industry under its control, so that from vaccines to diagnostics to medical care, everything is free of cost in a country where a lot of its citizens are already reeling under intensifying economic hardship. The prohibitive cost of medical care is a barrier blocking all those who need life-saving care, and is even pushing people deeper into poverty.”
It notes, “Countries like Spain have recently nationalised their health services, whereas about 30 countries, including Canada, the United Kingdom, Brazil, South Africa, Cuba and Sri Lanka have had a government-funded healthcare system for a long time.”
Calling vaccine manufacturers “greedy”, the statement says, while the “Despite UK based AstraZeneca/Oxford that did the research and development of the Covid vaccine, claiming that it will rollout the vaccine at no profit, the manufacturer of this vaccine in India (Serum Institute of India which is selling it as ‘Covishield’) is reaping profits.”
It regrets, as for Covaxin, another vaccine for Covid that is being sold by Bharat Biotech but whose initial important research took place in government's National Institute of Virology, Indian Council of Medical Research, it “announced that it will sell the vaccine to central government at Rs 150 but charge Rs 600 from state governments and Rs 1,200 from private.”
It asks, “Should not government strictly regulate these greedy vaccine manufacturers so that they are not able to reap unlimited profits? Also why should not government take over these vaccine manufacturing and nationalize it?”
Insisting that “oygen used by industries must be stopped immediately and all oxygen be made available for healthcare services”, the statement says, “As per news, 30% of Covid admissions are of VIP for mild to moderate symptoms. VIP culture must come to an end. All admissions to hospitals should happen in a coordinated manner using some transparent system which can inform patients, if they cannot be admitted immediately, how much they may have to wait.”
At the same time, the statement says, “The UP government has ignored the 2018 Allahabad High Court’s Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice Ajeet Kumar order that all receiving salaries from the government and their family members should get themselves treated at government health care facilities. Implementation of this order alone will make the government health care robust. So this should be immediately implemented.”

Online petition

Meanwhile, SPI has begun an online petition demanding that the Modi government must “ensure free roll out of Covid vaccines”, insisting, “Government must procure vaccines for all people from the manufacturers at the lowest possible price, or nationalize vaccine manufacturing because important scientific vaccine development was done using public resources for both vaccines currently used in India (Covishield and Covaxin).”
The petition says, “As Covaxin’s important research was done by ICMR, it is likely that the government will have the intellectual property rights. Perhaps that is why government has selected another manufacturer for Covaxin, Pune-based Haffkine institute. We demand that government should disclose if it holds the intellectual property rights and if yes, then allow every vaccine manufacturer in India and worldwide to manufacture it without delay to help save lives.”
Wanting the Government of India to “directly bulk procure vaccines efficiently from the manufacturer at a price which should not allow manufacturers to earn super profits”, petition demands, “Government should not allow separate pricing for central/ national government and state governments”, wondering, “Why is government not regulating and announcing prices rather letting industry announce prices?”

Comments

TRENDING

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Kolkata dialogue flags policy and finance deficit in wetland sustainability

By A Representative   Wetlands were the focus of India–Germany climate talks in Kolkata, where experts from government, business, and civil society stressed both their ecological importance and the urgent need for stronger conservation frameworks. 

'Fraudulent': Ex-civil servants urge President to halt Odisha tribal land dispossession

By A Representative   A collective of 81 retired civil servants from the Constitutional Conduct Group has written to the President of India expressing alarm over what they describe as the wrongful dispossession of tribal lands in Odisha’s Rayagada district. The letter, dated April 19, 2026, highlights violent clashes in Kantamal village where police personnel reportedly injured over 70 tribal residents attempting to protect their community rights. 

Dhandhuka violence: Gujarat minority group seeks judicial action, cites targeted arson

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat has written to the Director General of Police seeking judicial action in connection with recent violence in Dhandhuka town of Ahmedabad district, alleging targeted attacks on properties belonging to members of the Muslim community following a fatal altercation between two bike riders on April 18.

Maoist activity in India: Weakening structures, 'shifts' in leadership, strategy and ideology

By Harsh Thakor*  Recent statements by government representatives have suggested that Maoism in India has been effectively eliminated, citing the weakening of central leadership and intensified security operations. These claims follow sustained counterinsurgency efforts across key regions, including central and eastern India. However, available information from security agencies and independent observers indicates that while the organizational structure of the CPI (Maoist) has been significantly disrupted, elements of the movement remain active. Reports acknowledge the continued presence of cadres in certain forested regions such as Bastar and parts of Dandakaranya, alongside smaller, decentralized units adapting their operational strategies.

Cracks in Gujarat model? Surat’s exodus reveals precarity behind prosperity claims

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*   The return of migrant workers from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, particularly from Gujarat, was inevitable. Gujarat has long been showcased as the epitome of “infrastructure” and the business-friendly Modi model. Yet, when governments become business-friendly, they require the poor to serve them—while keeping them precarious, unable to stabilize, demand fair wages, or assert their rights. The agenda is clear: workers must remain grateful for whatever crumbs the Seth ji offers.  

Why link women’s reservation to delimitation? The unspoken political calculus

By Vikas Meshram*  April 16, 2026, is likely to be recorded as a special day in the history of Indian democracy. In a three-day special session of Parliament, the central government is set to introduce a comprehensive package of three historic bills: the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026; the Delimitation Bill, 2026; and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The stated purpose of all three is the same: to implement the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Constitutional Amendment) passed in 2023. However, the political intent concealed behind these measures — and their impact on the federal balance — is far more profound. It is absolutely essential to understand this.

From Manesar to Noida: Workers take to streets for bread, media looks away

By Sunil Kumar*   Across several states in India, a workers’ movement is gathering momentum. This is not a movement born of luxury or ambition, nor a demand for power-sharing within the state. At its core lies a stark and basic plea: the right to survive with dignity—adequate food, and wages sufficient to afford it.

Catholic union opposes FCRA amendments, warns of threat to Church institutions

By A Representative   The All India Catholic Union (AICU) has raised serious concerns over what it describes as growing threats to religious freedom, minority rights, and constitutional safeguards in India, warning that recent policy and legislative trends could undermine the country’s secular and federal framework.