SBI denies information under RTI regarding names of purchasers of electoral bonds

Anjali Bhardwaj, Amrita Johri*
In November 2019, information accessed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act had revealed how the government pushed through the anonymous Electoral Bonds (EB) Scheme, ignoring warnings of the Election Commission of India and RBI, which termed anonymous funding via Electoral Bonds "a retrograde step" for transparency and highlighted that they would lead to money laundering and more black money in the system.
In December 2019, applications under the RTI Act were filed seeking information from all 29 branches of the State Bank of India, which are authorised to sell Electoral Bonds. The following information was sought:

Total number of electoral bonds sold since January 2, 2018.
Total value of electoral bonds sold since January 2, 2018.
Total number of electoral bonds sold in the denomination of Rs 1 crore since January 2, 2018.
Names of all persons who have purchased electoral bonds in the denomination of Rs 1 crore since January 2, 2018.

Of the 29 branches, 23 have replied to the RTI applications. Of these 23, the information reveals that 11,770 electoral bonds (EBs) have been sold from these branches worth Rs 5936.7 crore. Of the 11,770 bonds, 5,463 were of the denomination of Rs. 1 crore which means that 92% of the amount given through bonds was in the denomination of Rs. 1 crore. For 6 branches- Lucknow, Patna, Ranchi, Vishakhapatnam, Chennai and Thiruvananthapuram, no information has been received till date.

All the branches denied information on the names of persons who purchased bonds in the denomination of Rs 1 crore

All the branches denied information on the names of persons who purchased bonds in the denomination of Rs 1 crore stating that “the information sought by the applicant cannot be disclosed as it is in fiduciary capacity, disclosure of which is exempted under 8(1)(e) and 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005.”
This is a violation of peoples’ right to know. The public authority has failed to weigh the issue of larger public interest, which is mandatorily required in each case in which information is denied under section 8 of the RTI Act.
Information accessed under the RTI Act shows that EBs worth Rs 1,880 crore were bought from the Mumbai branch followed by Rs 1,440 crore from Kolkata branch and Rs 919 crore New Delhi branch. The information is presented in tabulated form HERE.
Even as the petition seeking stay on the EB scheme is listed for hearing before the Supreme Court, the government has opened the 13th window for sale and encashment of electoral bonds from January 13, 2020. The case challenging the EB scheme was filed in 2017 in Supreme Court.

---
*With National Campaign for People’s Right to Information

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan * Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.

Counterview

Search This Blog