Skip to main content

Modi's "Hindu" economics: Development sans investment? Calling bluff from officially-released facts

By Hemantkumar Shah*
Capital investment is essential for development. Production, and thereby national and people's income, increase when small and big companies and enterprises make investment. Yet the fact is, under the Modi regime capital investment is not going up.
In 2016-17 Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF), that is investment in machinery, was 28.5% of national income, i.e. GDP. It remained at the same level in 2017-18.
After Modi came to power, the base year for this calculation was changed to 2011-12. With that base year, the Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR) of GFCF during two year period of 2012-14 was 11.20%.
With the previous base year of 2004-05, for the eight-year period of 2004-12, the AAGR of GFCF remained at 20.57%. If we take in to account the 10-year period, it works out to 15.88%.
During the Modi regime of four years, 2014-18, the AAGR of GFCF was just 2.09%. In 2016-17, it reduced by 6.13%! It was Rs. 40.03 lakh crore in the previous year and reduced to 37.98 lakh crore in 2016-17!
These figures show that the Modi government has failed in attracting small or big, Indian or foreign investment in the country.
Is this Modi's Hindu economics? Clearly, the claim of Modi government is wrong when he says that in 60 years nothing has been done and only he is developing India.

Foreign direct investment

It is claimed that Narendra Modi successfully attracted foreign investment in India by touring various countries in the world during last four years. This is another great bluff. Let us examine the facts:
The 2006-07 year was a watershed year for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in India, when FDi went up by 2.5 times of the previous year. Since then it went up continuously.
The above table shows that the AAGR was highest during 2004-14 period in the 21st century. During Modi's regime it was reduced to an almost half of it, and it went further down to 8% in 2016-17 and mere 3% last year.
This simply means that foreign companies do not see India as an attractive destination for investment under Modi regime.

Rupee's decay

During the 2014 Lok Sabha elections campaign, it was claimed that the Indian rupee will be brought to level of 40 with respect to one US$, if Modi comes to power. It has now been proved beyond any doubt that it was a bluff par excellence, propagated by Modi himself and his bhakts.
When Modi assumed power on May 26, 2014, the exchange rate was Rs. 58.73. On June 28, 2018, it was Rs 69.10. Thus, average annual rate of depreciation works out to be 4.41%.
The exchange rate was Rs. 45.32 in 2004. Thus, the average annual rate of depreciation of value of Indian Rupee was 2.96 % for the 10-year rule of Manmohan Singh.
It shows that Indian Rupee has been comparatively devalued with higher speed in last four years of the Modi raj!
(Sources: Reserve Bank of India; A note dated 31-05-2018, published by the Department of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India; Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Government of India)
---
*Professor of economics, Gujarat University

Comments

TRENDING

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Farewell to Saleem Samad: A life devoted to fearless journalism

By Nava Thakuria*  Heartbreaking news arrived from Dhaka as the vibrant city lost one of its most active and committed citizens with the passing of journalist, author and progressive Bangladeshi national Saleem Samad. A gentleman who always had issues to discuss with anyone, anywhere and at any time, he passed away on 22 February 2026 while undergoing cancer treatment at Dhaka Medical College Hospital. He was 74. 

From ancient wisdom to modern nationhood: The Indian story

By Syed Osman Sher  South of the Himalayas lies a triangular stretch of land, spreading about 2,000 miles in each direction—a world of rare magic. It has fired the imagination of wanderers, settlers, raiders, traders, conquerors, and colonizers. They entered this country bringing with them new ethnicities, cultures, customs, religions, and languages.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah  A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov, the artist who survived Stalin's cultural purges

By Harsh Thakor*  Sergei Vasilyevich Gerasimov (September 14, 1885 – April 20, 1964) was a Soviet artist, professor, academician, and teacher. His work was posthumously awarded the Lenin Prize, the highest artistic honour of the USSR. His paintings traced the development of socialist realism in the visual arts while retaining qualities drawn from impressionism. Gerasimov reconciled a lyrical approach to nature with the demands of Soviet socialist ideology.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution. 

Public money, private profits: Crop insurance scheme as goldmine for corporates

By Vikas Meshram   The farmer in India is not merely a food provider; he is the soul of the nation. For centuries, enduring natural calamities and bearing debt generation after generation while remaining loyal to the soil, this community now finds itself trapped in a different kind of crisis. In February 2016, the Modi government launched the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) with the stated objective of freeing farmers from the shackles of debt. It was an ambitious attempt to provide a strong safety net to cultivators repeatedly devastated by excessive rainfall, drought, and hailstorms.