Skip to main content

19% rural UP women taking maternal care 'shouted upon, insulted, threatened': Survey

A study funded, among others, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, seeking to analyse what it calls person-centred maternity care or PCMC, has found that 57% of the 1,475 women surveyed taking maternity care in India reported that health service providers, including hospital managers, doctors and nurses, “never asked permission before performing medical procedures”, while 69% of women “reported that providers did not explain the purpose of examinations or procedures”.
Regretting that 58% of the women reported that they did not receive explanations on medications they were given, the study, published in the prestigious health journal “Lancet”, and carried out by Patience A Afulani, Beth Phillips, Raymond A Aborigo and Cheryl A Moyer, further found that in 18% of cases of doctors, nurses, or other health-care providers generally “shouted, scolded, insulted, threatened, or talked rudely” on women who had come for maternity care.
Carried out among women in Ghana, Kenya and India, the survey involved women in the age group 15–49 (average age 25) in 20 “predominantly rural” districts or Uttar Pradesh, with the University of California and the Community Empowerment Lab (India) working as collaborative partners. The “cross-sectional study” was carried out to find out the quality of maternity care in rural Uttar Pradesh.
The study revealed that in 23% of cases doctors, nurses, or other staff did not generally treat women for with respect, and in about 19% of cases they were shouted upon, scolded, insulted, or threatened. However, in 97% of cases, the women agreed, they were not “treated roughly” – by being pushed, beaten, slapped, pinched, physically restrained, or gagged.
The survey found that during examinations in the labour room, 32% of those surveyed complained they were “not covered up”; 38% said they felt that their “health information was or will be kept confidential”; and in 98% of cases the healthcare providers never introduced themselves when they first came to see the women.
Further, in 50% of cases the healthcare providers didn’t call the women by their name; and in 71% cases doctors, nurses or other staff at the facility did not involve women in the decisions about their care. Further, during delivery, in 87% of cases, the doctors, nurses, or other staff at the facility did not seek permission or consent before doing procedures on women. 
According to the survey, in 69% of cases the doctors and nurses never explained why they were doing examinations or procedures; in 78% of cases most of the time the health service providers did not explain what medicines were being given; in 35% of cases they generally did not feel like any questions which they had; in 78% of cases the doctors and nurses did not talk to them about how they were feeling; and in 55% of cases they did not try to understand the women’s anxieties.
Coming to infrastructure of the health facilities, the survey found that 39% of those surveyed felt that the labour and postnatal wards were crowded; 37% said the wards, washrooms, and the general environment of the health facility were dirty or very dirty; and 15% said most of the time there was no water facility.
Pointing out that in a scale in which 0 is the worst score and 90 is the best, the healthcare facilities in India had PCMC score of 40, the study, however, said, “In India, employed and wealthier women reported a higher PCMC score than did unemployed and poorer women, as did women who delivered in the health centres when compared with those who delivered in hospitals.”

Comments

TRENDING

World Hijab Day? Ex-Muslim women observe Feb 1 as No Hijab Day, insist: 'Put it on a Man'

I didn't know that there could ever be a thing as World Hijab Day until I received an email alert from Maryam Namazie of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB), stating that several ex-Muslim women's groups had observed the same day—February 1—as No Hijab Day! According to Namazie, the day "was created on February 1 as a direct response to World Hijab Day" to "illuminate the coercive and oppressive realities of the hijab as a pillar of sex apartheid and a war on women."

Google powered AI refuses to correct grammar of a 'balanced' piece on Trump sending chained immigrants to India!

This is a continuation of my blog on how, while the start-up-developed AI app DeepSeek is being criticized for consistently rejecting content related to China or Maoism, there appears to be no mention in Western media about why another app, developed by the powerful Google, Gemini, remains silent on Indian political issues.  

5% poor in India? Union govt claim debunked, '26.4% of population below poverty line'

A recent paper, referring to the Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) 2022-23 of the Government of India (GoI), has debunked the official claim that poverty has substantially declined. Titled "Poverty in India: The Rangarajan Method and the 2022–23 Household Consumption Expenditure Survey", the paper —authored by scholars CA Sethu, LT Abhinav Surya, and CA Ruthu—states that "more than a quarter of India’s population falls below the poverty line."

Gujarat a police state? How top High Court advocate stunned a senior-most journalist

Rajdeep Sardesai, Anand Yagnik This is a continuation of my earlier blog on well-known journalist Rajdeep Sardesai's lecture in memory of the late Achyut Yagnik at the Ahmedabad Management Association (AMA). I was a little surprised when I received the intimation about the venue for the lecture.

How the middle classes are returning to the BJP fold, be it Delhi or Gujarat: Mahakumbh, Sitharaman's budget

Whatever reasons may be offered for the Aam Aadmi Party's defeat in Delhi—whether it was the BJP's promises of more freebies than AAP, the shedding of ultra-nationalist slogans, or the successful demolition of Arvind Kejriwal's "Mr. Clean" image—my recent interaction with a group of middle-class individuals highlighted a notable trend. Those who had just begun to sit on the fence were now once again returning to the BJP fold.

Why burn Manusmriti? Why not preserve it to demonstrate, display historicity of casteism?

In a significant Facebook post, Rana Singh, former associate professor of English at Patna University, has revealed something that few seem to know. Titled "The Shudras in Manusmriti", Singh says,  because Manusmriti is discussed so often, he thought of reading it himself. “This book likely dates back to the 2nd or 3rd century BCE, and the presence of contradictory statements suggests that it is not the work of a single author,” he says in his Facebook post in Hindi, written in 2022 and recently reshared.

Talking of increased corporate control over news, Rajdeep Sardesai 'evades' alternative media

When I received an intimation that well-known journalist Rajdeep Sardesai was to speak at the Ahmedabad Management Association (AMA) on February 2, my instant reaction was: I know what he is going to say—his views are quite well known; he wouldn’t be saying anything new. Yet, I decided to go and listen to him to catch his mood at a time when the media, as he (and I) knew it, is changing fast due to the availability of new technological tools that were not accessible even a decade ago.

Trump’s research cuts 'may mean' advantage China: But will India leverage global brain drain to its advantage?

When I heard from a couple of NRI professionals—currently on work visas and engaged in research projects at American universities—that one of President Donald Trump's major policy thrusts was to cut federal funding to the country's top educational institutions, I was instantly reminded of what Prof. Kaushik Basu had said while delivering a lecture in Ahmedabad.

I'm flattered: A New York media house claims I was a KGB agent! Wow, I didn't know that

I was astonished, let me say pleasantly surprised, on receiving a comment by Rich TVX News  on my blog   "Why predictions of an imminent collapse of the Russian economy may be wrong" (January 28).  I don't know who wrote the strange comment from this "media house", which is based in New York, and claims to "hold sway not only among the masses but also within global corridors of power, influencing esteemed politicians and shaping international diplomacy, especially evident during pivotal events like the ongoing crisis in Ukraine."