Skip to main content

'Wedding of the century': What does Mukesh Ambani want to prove by such extravaganza?

By NS Venkataraman* 

Mukesh  Ambani,   a renowned Indian industrialist who is said to be the richest person in India and  one of the richest persons in the world,   has just now conducted the wedding celebration of  his son in Mumbai,   with unheard level of lavishness in India.
It appears that a few million dollars of money must have been spent  in conducting this wedding,    which was attended by past Prime Ministers and Presidents from different countries,  CEOs of several multinational organisations,  popular film  stars and sports persons and of course,   lawyers,  politicians  and journalists.
It is further said that Mukesh Amabani  sent separate aircrafts to different destinations  to bring these so-called VIPs  (very important persons),  lodged them in leading hotels in lavish style.  The event was widely publicized in  print and visual media in India   and  a few other countries. Several media called this wedding as the wedding of the century,  whatever it may mean.
There is no doubt that Mukesh Ambani has earned several millions of dollars of income by hard work,  sustained and intelligent investment and promoted large scale projects in multiple fields  with dynamic management practices.  All credit can be given to him for such achievements.
But,  is there not a sign of vulgarity and exhibition of  enormous ego in conducting such lavish  wedding  celebrations?  What does Mukesh Ambani want to prove by such extravaganza?   In throwing away money by conducting such luxurious wedding celebration,  is he not aware that many people may  suspect  his mental state and thought process,   which does not certainly reflect any level of thinking at a higher level?
India is a country with 1,400 million people,  of which 15% of the population still live below poverty line and around 40% of the population are just  above the border line of poverty level.   Has  Mukesh Ambani  thought about these people in his “hour of glory”?  By wasting his wealth in such luxurious wedding function,   he has lost the opportunity to use this money for helping the cause of the poor and downtrodden, who  constitute lakhs of people in India. 
In throwing away money by conducting luxurious wedding celebration,  isn't he aware, many people may  suspect his mental state?
By spending for the benefit of poor people,   while celebrating the marriage in simple style, instead of throwing money in wasteful wedding exercise,   Mukesh Ambani and the young couple would have received the blessings of millions of people,  which will stand him and his family in good stead in future. Such blessing are   far more significant and important than the praise and admiration that Mukesh Ambani  received from his rich guests.
Just like days follow night,   the wedding celebration of three days  would also go away,   leaving only bitter thoughts  and frustration in the mind of the poor  people in India,   who would inevitably ponder about the state of their life with the life style of the rich and affluent people. Such   unacceptable exhibition of wealth  would only create a sense of   anger towards  rich people   amongst those who have to fight for square meal a day.
It is inevitable that in the mind of deprived of people and discerning observers,  there would be development of feelings of contempt for Mukesh Ambani’s style and for the similar style of other rich people too.
Human life is essentially a time passing exercise  and  people with noble thoughts would not believe in   such ego centric actions. 
Money is noble when spent for good cause. Money becomes evil and even vulgar when thrown away for ego centric actions. 
This above conclusion is not only applicable to Mukesh  Ambani but to several other ego centric wealthy persons and families   and politicians who could be gathering  curses rather than blessings by celebrating  lavish marriages which become an eyesore for the discerning people and those facing poverty conditions.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Mark Tully: The voice that humanised India, yet soft-pedalled Hindutva

By Harsh Thakor*  Sir Mark Tully, the British broadcaster whose voice pierced the fog of Indian history like a monsoon rain, died on January 25, 2026, at 90, leaving behind a legacy that reshaped investigative journalism. Born in the fading twilight of the Raj in 1935, in Tollygunge, Calcutta, Tully's life was a bridge between empires and republics, a testament to how one man's curiosity could humanize a nation's chaos. 

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.