Skip to main content

Union budget takes 'no steps' to address alarming inequality, enhance redistribution

By Raj Shekhar* 

The Right to Food Campaign has expressed its deep disappointment that in the budget announcement for 2024-25 rather than enhancing spending in the critical area of food security, the budget has either remained stagnant or has declined. 
The budget estimate for the food subsidy under the National Food Security Act for Financial Year (FY) 2024-25 is Rs. 2.05 lakh crore which is 3.3% less than the revised estimates for the previous financial year. When by all accounts, it is clear that the country is facing a major crisis of malnutrition and food insecurity, it is indeed shocking that the food subsidy budget has been cut.
The POSHAN (school mid-day meal) scheme sees a slight increase from BE 2023-24 of ₹11,600 crores to ₹12,467 crores (this is however less than the actual expenditure on this scheme in 2022-23 of ₹12,681 crores). 
The Saksham Anganwadi scheme for children under six years, pregnant and lactating women, and adolescent girls, also sees a decrease and gets a budgetary allocation of ₹21,200 crore (RE 2023-24 was ₹21,523 crores). 
Samarthya which includes maternity entitlements (Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana, PMMVY) and the creche schemes sees a reduction in its allocation to ₹2,517 crores compared to BE 2023-24 of ₹2,582 crores.
The Union Budget has once again failed to address the rural distress. The allocations for the MGNREGA is the same as the revised estimates for last year. The Budget has neglected the long-standing demands of the farmers for MSP at C2+50% with guaranteed procurement. This has been a strong demand for the Right to Food Campaign as well for many years in support of farmers in their struggle.
One is shocked at the apathy and uncaring attitude of the government towards people, especially those most in need of food and nutrition support. Rather than dismissing reports highlighting the ground reality of hunger and malnutrition and spending time and resources to counter them, the government should acknowledge the problems and enhance food security provisions. 
The government has failed to include any measures to address the alarming levels of inequality in the country and continues to be anti-poor and pro-corporate.
---
*Secretariat, Right to Food Campaign

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

When Sardar Patel opposed reservation, asked Scheduled Castes to give up their “inferiority” complex

Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel By Dr Hari Desai* It is ironical indeed. Though Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was opposed to any kind of reservation in the government jobs and education as well as in the legislatures (like Mahatma Gandhi), even today his name is being drawn in controversies in the present-day agitations demanding reservation in India.

Activists Akriti, Satyam Verma face NSA in Noida protest case: PUCL

By A Representative   Human rights activist Kavita Shrivastava has alleged that the Uttar Pradesh Police is invoking the National Security Act (NSA) against two activists associated with Mazdoor Bigul in connection with the Noida workers’ protest case, even as labour unrest continues to spread across industrial belts in several northern states.