Article 21 'overturned' by new criminal laws: Lawyers, activists remember Stan Swamy

By Gova Rathod*

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Gujarat, organised an event in Ahmedabad entitled “Remembering Fr. Stan Swamy in Today’s Challenging Reality” in the memory of Fr. Stan Swamy on his third death anniversary. The event included a discussion of the new criminal laws enforced since July 1, 2024.

At the start of the event Fr. Cedric Prakash spoke about Fr. Stan Swamy, a fearless defender of tribal rights in Jharkhand, who was arrested by the NIA in 2018 in the context of the Bhima Koregaon case.

Human rights defenders and members of political parties across the nation had protested the arrest of the then 81-year-old activist who had worked tirelessly with Adivasis to defend their rights. He passed away on July 5, 2021 at the Holy Family Hospital, Mumbai, due to complications related to Covid while still under arrest, said Prakash.

Advocate Lara Jesani of the Bombay High Court delivered the keynote address and discussed the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) which have replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act, respectively and their implications for citizens’ rights.

She expressed serious concern regarding the manner in which the Law Commission was bypassed, views of public and experts not considered in the process of overhauling the criminal jurisprudence of the country, by just entrusting the task to a five member committee.

It was strange that when 80-85% of the BNS, BNSS and BSA was taken verbatim from the erstwhile CRPC, IPC and the Indian Evidence Act and just reorganised, rather than “decolonised” as claimed, that the laws were replaced when the limited changes could have been brought through amendments as was being done from time to time, she added.

While examining the new criminal laws, Jesani expounded on the issues they throw up, some key ones being:

(i) the discretion given to the police to conduct a preliminary investigation before deciding whether an FIR should be filed,

(ii) the vagueness in the number of days of police custody that could be granted which could result in a situation where the earlier provision limiting to the first 15 days could be now extended to 60 or 90 days, and thereby almost pre-closing the possibility of bail during this entire period

(iii) the introduction of provisions from anti-terror law UAPA into the BNS, the introduction of the controversial sedition-like law in a graver and more dangerous form,

(iv) criminalisation of hunger strike by protestors, and

(v) the admissibility of electronic evidence without any safeguards for privacy and data protection or procedures for seizure of devices and integrity of device and data, and other provisions which give arbitrary and sweeping powers to the police.

The way Stan Swamy was incarcerated shows, new criminal laws could be used to snatch away civil liberties and fundamental freedoms of citizens

Jesani said that not only would these ill-conceived changes brought about through the new criminal laws lead to chaos in court and increased litigations in an already stressed legal system, but they are regressive and contradict the law laid down in several landmark Supreme Court judgements like in the case of DK Basu, Joseph Shine and Lalita Kumari, and are violative of fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

Activist Nirjhari Sinha spoke on how these laws could be used to curtail the freedom of speech, especially of independent media and fact-checkers. The window of 15 days given to the police to investigate and ascertain prima facie the commission of an offence would have far-reaching implications on ensuring justice in cases of sexual violence.

Advocate Amrish Patel emphasized how the procedural law in the earlier criminal jurisprudence flowed from Article 21, which has been overturned by the new laws.

Advocate Shamsad Pathan said that the struggle of the minorities to make their voices heard in the context of the spread of hate speech and targeted violence would be seriously affected as a result of the sweeping powers given to the police in the new criminal laws.

Activist Kishor Chaudhury said that the impact of the new laws was already being felt in the Adivasi community. The police already cited the new laws when the Adivasi organizations informed them about the Indigenous Day celebrations on 9th August; and that Adivasis should limit to their ‘cultural programmes’ on this day and not any political demonstrations.

Trade union leader Ashim Roy was positive that the various stakeholders, especially the legal fraternity and civil society activists, would stand up against the new criminal laws and spearhead a collective, democratic and transparent process that would compel the government to withdraw the new criminal laws.

I told the meet that the manner in which Fr. Stan Swamy was incarcerated under draconian laws were an indication of how the new criminal laws could be used to snatch away civil liberties and fundamental freedoms of citizens.

I expressed my apprehension that the changes in procedural law as envisaged in the new criminal laws could have serious implications on laws like the SC&ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The new laws would be instrumental in suppressing the on-going struggles of the Dalit and Adivasi communities for justice.

---

*PUCL Gujarat, General Secretary

Comments

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

Search This Blog