After India visit twice, Hasina’s China visit a ‘pragmatic balancing act'

By Ozair Islam*

On July 10, Bangladesh's prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, concluded her three-day official visit to China from July 08-10. The leader of Bangladesh made a successful maiden trip to China after being re-elected in January. Following two trips to India in June, Sheikh Hasina's journey to China might be characterized as a balancing act.

For the sake of the south Asian country’s national interests, Dhaka is delicately balancing between two major nations. China has been seen as Bangladesh's most important development partner, while Bangladesh views India as its most significant political ally.

Sheikh Hasina has been managing relations between China and India in a balanced manner. As one of Dhaka’s good neighbourhood diplomatic policy, she believes that New Delhi is crucial to Dhaka. She views China as a nation Bangladesh can learn a lot from at the same time.

Bangladesh is in dire need of improved infrastructure, more investment, and technical help due to its fast economic expansion. The World Bank claims that Bangladesh's economy has continued to develop at one of the quickest rates in the world since 2000. As a result, Hasina has guaranteed Bangladesh's increased involvement in advancing the Belt and Road Initiative, which China has suggested.

Since Hasina's government's primary objective is to strengthen Bangladesh's economy, closer economic relations between China and Bangladesh, as well as its recent elevation from a strategic partnership to a comprehensive strategic-cooperative partnership, are not surprising.

Bangladesh now places a higher priority on strategic autonomy due to the growth of its national might. Bangladesh is seen as a major participant in the Indo-Pacific Strategy, although it retains its own perspectives on the region's awareness and vision, emphasizing economic concerns above geopolitical maneuvers.

China has been involved in the development of infrastructure projects related to transportation, electricity distribution, and communications in addition to lending money and transferring technology. Hasina has on many times expressed her respect for the route China has gone. China and Bangladesh, both emerging nations, aim to raise the quality of life and quicken socioeconomic growth.

Because of this, bilateral collaboration may exhibit mutual respect and be complimentary. Hasina's visit brought up the topic of Bangladesh's willingness to resolve the Rohingya situation. Despite the humanitarian stance that Hasina's administration provided to the refugees, the problem remains unresolved, and the refugees are now a burden on Bangladesh. China needs a pragmatic stance in this regard to motivate Myanmar to take back the refugees. China has also pledged to provide 1 billion RMB in economic aid to Bangladesh in an effort to reduce economic challenges.

Hasina's recent trips to China and India demonstrate her practical approach to international relations. Despite concerns raised in India on China's influence in Bangladesh, Hasina is eager to strengthen her ties with both China and India. She is seen as an amiable foreign political figure in India. In June 2024, Sheikh Hasina visited India twice. Beyond their obvious diplomatic worth, the two trips also served as a message about Bangladesh's geopolitical policy, coming immediately before Sheikh Hasina's recent visit to China from July 8–10, 2024. Sheikh Hasina's diplomacy includes finding a balance amongst the main regional powers including India and China.

Following Hasina's election victory, the Indian media focused on the nation she would choose for her first international trip. Along with other leaders of South Asia, Hasina initially attended Modi's swearing-in ceremony before going on a separate state visit.

The choice was well received in India, which saw Hasina's two trips to the country in less than a month as proof of the two nations' unwavering affinity. The historical connections between Bangladesh and India have had a significant political influence on the current state of their diplomatic relations.

Past discussions have resolved a number of issues between Bangladesh and India, such as the sharing of water, the exchange of enclaves, and connectivity. India encircles the nation on three sides; there is no gain in a confrontation with New Delhi. In light of the observable outcomes of the visit to India, up to ten Memoranda of Understandings (MoUs) and some specific declarations have been made.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said that he would send a technical team to Bangladesh to assess the benefits and drawbacks of the Teesta water sharing project, in spite of chief minister of West Bengal Mamata Banerjee’s objections. At the same time, Hasina inked 21 agreements and memoranda of understanding with China during her meeting with Premier Li Keqiang and President Xi Jinping. Hasina’s visit will strengthen people-to-people connectivity, trade, investment, technology transfer, business, and economic ties with China. This necessitates keeping these two Asian influential countries in a strategic equilibrium.

Hasina prioritized Bangladesh's economic interests and did not consciously seek to align herself with either China or India. Bangladesh desires cordial relations with all of its neighbors, in accordance with her statements. Her foreign policy is not contradictory, she believes. China has shown Bangladesh that it is a responsible and fruitful regional actor that is eager to share its rewards.

President Xi emphasized the need for further collaboration between the two nations in battling unipolar hegemony, outside meddling, serving as a voice for the global south, the digital economy, and together creating the Digital Silk Road. Xi's ideas align with Hasina's vision for a digital Bangladesh. China appears open to expanding its educational exchange, climate diplomacy, youth, individual, and media contacts with Bangladesh.

Bangladesh expects to enjoy a politically stable atmosphere and be able to concentrate on its growth. Both India and China are and should remain its most reliable ally.

---

*Freelance writer and columnist based in Dhaka

Comments

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

Search This Blog