Skip to main content

Pervasive, systemic labour violations in this hospital of Bengaluru: NGO team

Counterview Desk
Following the non-payment of wages for two months and the refusal of employment to 55 ward attendants from Victoria Hospital, Bengaluru on May 8th, 2024, and the subsequent protest waged by these workers, a fact-finding team was constituted to investigate potential labour rights violations at the hospital. 
The fact-finding team consisting of Aishwarya Ravikumar from People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Poorna Ravishankar from Naveddu Niladdidre, Maaligaraya from Tamate, Bengaluru, Madhulika T. and Avani Chokshi from All India Lawyers Association for Justice and two independent researchers, Siddharth KJ and Dr. Mamatha KN undertook their fact-finding over the course of 13th to 16th May.

Summary

The team found pervasive and systemic labour violations at the hospital. Such violations were not the sole refrain of the 55 protesting workers who were removed from service but were a feature of working conditions of workers across the board, including of housekeeping, security staff and ward attendants who continued to work at the hospital. These issues ranged from delayed payment of wages, discrimination in pay to unsafe working conditions, non-payment of overtime wages to sham labour contract system.
As the team was conducting its fact-finding, the 55 protesting workers were reinstated after significant pressure from the worker’s protests and other quarters. However, the team felt that the labour conditions it discovered at the hospital, and the impact of such conditions on patients were too severe to be ignored. Consequently, it was decided that the fact-finding report would present a more expansive account of the labour conditions at the hospital.

Key findings:

Profile of workers: Most workers the team spoke to were women workers who hailed from the Dalit community, and worked at the hospital for several years, with some working for as long as 30 years.
No equal pay for equal work for workers performing similar work: Workers were hired under 3 categories at the hospital to perform the same kind of work, but at varied pay. The first category were permanent workers earning Rs 50,000 a month. However, the hospital had halted all hiring of permanent workers, and several permanent workers the team spoke to were on the brink of retirement. Category two are workers directly employed through direct contracts with Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute (BMCRI) who earn around Rs 20,000 a month and the third category are workers hired through contractors who are paid Rs 14,800 a month.
Core and essential duties: Ward attendants perform duties at the hospital, which are core to its functioning, and are still not recognized as essential to the hospital’s operations. The duty of ward attendants involves transportation of patients from one place to another; ensuring patient hygiene; completing housekeeping duties and provision of overall patient care duties including facilitating meetings with doctors etc. The significance of ward attendants to the hospital’s running was evident when the 55 ward attendants were refused employment. With fewer ward attendants, patients received less continuous attention, increasing the likelihood of medical complications.
Sham contract system: All the removed workers were contract workers. However, the contract system is illegitimate as all workers we spoke to continuously worked for years at the hospital, while contractors came and went. The contractor has no real control or supervision over the workers and seems to be an external agency brought in merely to deny workers’ their benefits. This practice violates the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which classifies employing workmen as “badlis”, casuals or temporaries with the object of depriving them of the status and privileges of permanent workmen as an unfair labour practice.
No appointment orders: None of the contract workers were issued appointment orders, giving wide leeway to the management and the contractors to modify the worker’s responsibilities and terms of employment as they saw fit.
Low and irregular wage payment: Payment of wages are regularly delayed, and illegal deductions are made from their salaries at the whim of the hospital management. Workers received their wages for March and April of this year only in June. The wages paid to workers were menial, and they lamented their difficulty with affording rent, children’s education, with their salary.  
Understaffing and excessive workload – non-payment of minimum wages for overtime work: Due to understaffing, it was discovered that existing workers were burdened with long hours of work but were not paid overtime wages for excess work performed in violation of the Minimum Wages Act. The workers on night shift were also not paid any night shift allowance. Due to the extremely high work pressure, workers were denied fixed lunch hours and get as little as 10 minutes to complete their lunch.
Punitive leave policy: Ward attendants are only given one full day off a week while housekeeping workers were only given half day off in the entire week. Beyond a weekly holiday, workers are not entitled to paid, casual or sick leave. Wages are deducted even when workers are unable to attend work due to  infections contracted from the hospital.
No free medical treatment: Workers and their families are at risk of contracting infections due to the nature of their work but are only given a rebate no free treatment from the hospital.
No transport for women workers: Several women ward attendants leave after 10 p.m. from the hospital after completing their work, and yet no transport is provided to them. At this time, since no buses are available, some workers walk over an hour in the dark to their houses.
Refusal of employment in violation of law: The workers were refused employment during the pendency of disputes for regularization, in violation of law. The Supreme Court has ruled that one set of ad hoc workers cannot be replaced by another set of workers of the same nature. Additionally, no notice or compensation was given to the workers before they were refused.
Impact on right to health of citizens: Victoria hospital being a government hospital is only available refuge for a vast number of vulnerable and poor people across the state. By refusing to staff the hospital adequately, the State is directly impinging on the rights of its citizens to receive quality medical treatment and is in effect violating the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Demands of fact-finding team:

Drawing from our investigation, the fact-finding team recommends the following:
  • Hiring contract workers in public health institutions like government hospitals must be stopped. Instead, health workers including non-medical staff must be hired directly, and be paid through the ‘Direct Pay System’ similar to the pourakarmikas
  • The legal violations of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and Contract Labour Abolition and Regulation Act, 1970 by the hospital must immediately be addressed and Victoria Hospital must act as a model employer
  • An effective grievance redressal mechanism with management and union representation must be constituted to deal with the various issues faced by workers at the hospital including legal violations, harassment, verbal abuse  etc.
  • In view of the impact of understaffing on public health, all necessary funds must be released to ensure proper staffing at Victoria Hospital
  • A multi-stakeholder audit group must be formed including with members from civil society, trade unions and from the government to conduct a thorough audit into the working conditions of all government hospitals across Karnataka

Comments

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.