2005 floods haunt Mumbai: Poor drainage, uncontrolled urbanisation, eco-degradation

By Nimisha Agarwal*

On July 26, 2005, Mumbai experienced an unprecedented rainfall of 944 mm in 24 hours, resulting in catastrophic flooding that claimed over 1,000 lives and caused extensive damage to infrastructure and property. This deluge, one of the worst in the city’s history, highlighted severe deficiencies in urban planning and flood management.

As we remember, that bleak day today 19 years ago, the ongoing 2024 monsoon season too is witnessing Mumbai once again grappling with severe flooding, disruption of transportation, closure of schools, and once again exposing the city's vulnerability to extreme rainfall. In a single day this season, Mumbai recorded over 300 mm of rainfall, leading to widespread waterlogging and significant disruptions in daily life.

Infrastructure Improvements Since 2005

Since the 2005 floods, Mumbai has made significant strides in improving its stormwater drainage system. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has undertaken various projects, including the installation of high-capacity pumps and the expansion of stormwater drains to handle up to 50 mm of rain per hour, doubling the previous capacity. Additionally, new pumping stations have been constructed to expedite water removal during heavy rainfall.

Floodgates have been introduced to control seawater ingress, a critical measure given Mumbai's coastal location. Currently, only three out of 105 outfalls are equipped with floodgates, highlighting both progress and limitations in this area. While these improvements have mitigated flooding to some extent, challenges remain in terms of the comprehensive implementation and maintenance of these systems.

Persistent challenges

Despite infrastructure improvements, Mumbai still faces persistent challenges exacerbating flood risks. Uncontrolled urban development has significantly impacted the city's ability to manage floodwaters. Unplanned construction, particularly in the northern suburbs, has led to increased surface runoff and overwhelmed drainage systems. For instance, areas like Andheri and Goregaon frequently experience severe flooding due to inadequate planning and drainage capacity.

Environmental degradation further compounds these issues. The loss of mangroves has reduced the city's resilience against floods. Between 1995 and 2005, Mumbai lost around 40% of its mangroves to illegal encroachments and construction projects, weakening flood prevention mechanisms.

Additionally, the city's infrastructure suffers from inadequate maintenance and upgrades. Many drainage projects face delays or fail to deliver expected outcomes due to insufficient funding and bureaucratic hurdles. For example, the long-proposed Brihanmumbai Stormwater Disposal System (BRIMSTOWAD) project has seen partial implementation, leaving many areas vulnerable during heavy rains.

Climate Change and Its Impact

Climate change has dramatically increased the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events in Mumbai, leading to severe monsoon flooding. Data shows a threefold rise in heavy rainfall events in central India, including Mumbai, between 1901 and 2015.

This surge in extreme weather patterns is attributed to increased warming in the Arabian Sea, which causes moisture-laden winds to bring intense and prolonged rainfall. The resulting floods disrupt daily life, damage infrastructure, and pose significant risks to public health and safety, underscoring the urgent need to address the impacts of climate change on the city.

The Big question - What needs to be done?

Since the 2005 floods, both community and government responses have made some interventions. Advances in disaster management protocols include the establishment of the Mumbai Disaster Management Cell, improved early warning systems, and regular emergency drills. Community initiatives have also played a crucial role, organizing flood response teams and awareness campaigns to educate residents on emergency preparedness.

Efforts have been made to mitigate this issue, including the BRIMSTOWAD project aimed at upgrading the city's drainage infrastructure. The installation of high-capacity pumps and the construction of holding ponds to store excess rainwater are steps in the right direction.

However, much remains to be done. The city needs to implement an integrated water management plan that includes the rejuvenation of natural water bodies and mangroves, which act as natural buffers. Upgrading and maintaining existing drainage systems are crucial, as is ensuring strict adherence to building regulations to prevent encroachment on floodplains. Public awareness campaigns on waste management can also help prevent blockages in drainage systems. Collaborative efforts between government bodies, urban planners, and the community are essential to create a resilient Mumbai capable of withstanding future monsoon seasons.

Dr Manu Gupta, co-founder of Sustainable Environment and Ecological Development Society (SEEDS), states: "This persistent issue in Mumbai demands far more attention and comprehensive solutions to prevent further suffering. Addressing the root causes, such as poor drainage systems, uncontrolled urban development, and environmental degradation, alongside enhancing community resilience, is essential to mitigate the impacts and protect the livelihoods of millions. Government initiatives need to be fortified with societal efforts in disaster resilience and environmental sustainability to arrest mounting losses thus paving the way for a safer Mumbai."

The 2005 Mumbai floods highlighted critical gaps in infrastructure, urban planning, and disaster management. While progress has been made, significant challenges remain. Continuous improvement in flood mitigation strategies, environmental conservation, and robust community involvement are essential to protect Mumbai from future climate-induced disasters. A collective effort is needed to build resilience and safeguard lives.

---

*With SEEDS

Comments

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

Search This Blog