Skip to main content

'Anti-poor stand': Even British wouldn't reduce Railways' sleeper and general coaches

By Anandi Pandey, Sandeep Pandey* 

Probably even the British, who introduced railways in India, would not have done what the Bhartiya Janata Party government is doing. The number of Sleeper and General class coaches in various trains are surreptitiously and ominously disappearing accompanied by a simultaneous increase in Air Conditioned coaches. In the characteristic style of BJP government there was no discussion or debate on this move by the Indian Railways either in the Parliament or outside of it. 
In a democratic country where majority of the population cannot afford to travel in AC coaches, and if anyone needs a proof of this just look at the condition in which people travel in General class. No weak hearted person would dare to enter these coaches where one may have to struggle at the gate to get inside the coach. 
One can imagine the fate of a sick, disabled, old, child or woman trying to travel in these coaches. Why would people travel in such a condition except for it is their compulsion? The fact is most of the people travelling in Sleeper and General classes simply cannot spend any more money in travel. 
The difference between the cost of a General class and Sleeper class is about 60-70% but the quality of travel comfort is markedly different. The cost of a Third AC class ticket is about 140-160% that of Sleeper class and is about the same as a non-AC ordinary bus fare for the same distance. Hence for a General class or Sleeper class passenger even an ordinary bus journey is prohibitively costly. 
Some of the trains called AC Expresses, Rajdhanis, Shatabdis and the newly introduced Vande Bharats have only AC coaches which a large majority of the population cannot afford. This implies that closing the option of Sleeper and General classes for ordinary passengers in India is a violation of the fundamental right of the citizen Article 19(d) of the Constitution, ‘to move freely throughout the territory of India. 
In the age of Artificial Intelligence why should it not be possible to dynamically adjust the number of coaches in accordance with the demand? Keeping the same number of total coaches the number of General class or AC coaches could be according to the number of passengers willing to travel that particular day in different classes.
The idea of having different classes for travel is itself incongruous with the idea of democracy. Furthermore, in AC coaches the passengers also get the benefit of bedsheets, blanket and pillow and in some trains the cost of ticket covers food as well. 
This exhibits the class bias of policy makers. Otherwise, logical reasoning would favour the idea of more benefits for poorer passengers rather than the rich. After all, as part of Public Distribution System food grains are given to the poor, not the rich. Similarly, blankets and clothes are ordinarily distributed to the poor. For the General class passengers the Railway authorities may not even bother about the cleanliness of their toilets or availability of water on a long distance journey. 
The class of the society which is granted the benefit of reservation on the basis of socio-economic-educational backwardness and untouchability has to travel in the Indian Railways unreserved and the elite, who are critical of the system of caste based reservation, obtain reservation of berths in coaches sometimes using a quota which is disbursed by the Railway Head Offices. Obviously a system of privileges for the elite prevails in the Indian Railways.
The manner in which various services like catering, sanitation and even ticket checking have been privatized, a government run company Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation has been allowed to run several private trains, the Tejas Express from Delhi to Lucknow being the first one introduced in 2019, the infrastructure at railway stations are being upgraded there is a clear indication of things moving in the direction of privatization. 
With increasing privatisation the Indian Railways will further become inaccessible to the poor or the poor would not be able to afford most services like the paid waiting lounges, etc. This raises a basic question of the purpose of existence of railways or any means of transportation for that matter. 
In AC coaches passengers get the benefit of bedsheets, blanket, even food. This exhibits the class bias of policy makers
Transportation and communication are two additional basic needs of human being to the commonly acknowledged food, clothing and shelter. These are fundamental rights as they are required for life with dignity. When Aam Admi Party government made bus travel for women free, it was not doing a favour to the people. 
Food, Clothing, Shelter, Transportation and Communication should be free in any society in addition to education and health-care. The idea of free travel, at least for women, is now gaining popularity. Hopefully, it’ll extend to the entire population and will cover all means of transportation. 
A truly Socialist government will make all public transportation free and most transportation will be public. People should hardly need to use private vehicles. Railways will be the most preferred means of long distance travel from the point of view of contributing least to global warming and for the same reason of global warming air travel will phase out. However, for medical emergency some provision of air travel could be kept.
The tendency of the BJP government to commercialise must be checked. These policies are meant to only favour private corporations of various kinds at the cost of the common citizens of this country. The increasing privatization restricts the democratic rights of the citizens. An ordinary passenger cannot complain against services rendered by private entities compared to when they were handled by the Indian Railways. 
For example, the cost of food is fixed by the Indian Railways authorities but the private contractor hires contract employees who argue in favour of protection of their interest when selling items at more than the prescribed cost. 
In a similar manner all services have been compromised and the passenger is left to the mercy of more and more private players. This trend has to be reversed if we want the right of citizens to be protected. The rulers of the BJP government think they are lording over this vast infrastructure of Indian Railways and are free to convert every service into profit making business venture. 
Indian Railways serves a social purpose and is the life line of India so far as movement of ordinary citizen is concerned. The rulers have no business to make a business out of it.
---
*Anandi Pandey is a student of politics and Sandeep Pandey is General Secretary, Socialist Party (India)

Comments

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.