Sustaining relevance through democratic means, does Indian Left still romanticize murder, slavery in Soviet bloc, China?

By Hemantkumar Shah*

The history of the 20th century is stained with the blood of millions who fell victim to communist regimes. In the name of revolution, anti-capitalism, and the pursuit of economic equality or socialism, countries like China, Russia, and many in Eastern Europe endured ruthless communist dictatorships. These regimes carried out mass killings, threw dissenters into prisons, and crushed personal freedoms — yet the Left, particularly in India, continues to ignore or rationalize this violent legacy.

It’s astonishing how the Left turns a blind eye to the atrocities committed under communist rule while fiercely opposing American and European capitalism or India’s version of capitalism and Hindu casteism. Their moral outrage is oddly selective — directed at Western democratic systems, but conspicuously silent about the brutality of regimes they ideologically support.

Consider these facts:

Between 1921 and 1953 in the Soviet Union, over 800,000 dissenters were executed. Another 1.3 to 1.7 million died in forced labor camps modeled on Hitler’s concentration camps. Nearly 390,000 peasants were killed outright. Joseph Stalin, who ruled for three decades, left behind a legacy of fear and mass repression.

In China, during the Cultural Revolution from 1966 to 1969, Mao Zedong's regime killed around 1.6 million people under the banner of ideological purification.

Eastern European countries — Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Georgia, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and more — were virtually enslaved by Soviet Russia until 1991. Isn’t Putin’s war on Ukraine today yet another attempt to reimpose that same imperial domination?

In Hungary, when people rose against communist dictatorship in 1956, Soviet forces killed 2,500 protestors and injured 20,000. Around 200,000 Hungarians had to flee their homeland.

In 1968, when citizens of Czechoslovakia non-violently protested against communist rule, the Soviet Union again deployed troops to crush their freedom, effectively re-enslaving the people.

These are just some examples. According to several neutral estimates, communist regimes across the globe have killed close to 100 million people and imprisoned millions more.

Critics of capitalism argue — with some validity — that it exploits people indirectly. But communist dictatorships didn’t just exploit — they killed, openly and brutally. They tolerated no dissent. What’s happening in China even today? Where are the voices of Indian leftists when it comes to China’s ongoing suppression of basic freedoms?

If we are to condemn autocracy, we must do so consistently. What about the authoritarian rule in Sunni Saudi Arabia in the name of religion? Or the repression in Shia Iran? Afghanistan is an even darker chapter. None of these can or should be justified, no matter their ideological or theological pretext.

Indian leftists and communists must not forget: their political relevance in Kerala, Tripura, and West Bengal was gained and sustained through democratic means — not through revolution or dictatorship. That’s the gift of India's capitalist democracy — it allowed communist parties to rise to power through elections.

Those who read Soviet Nobel laureate Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s works know that the cruelty of Soviet leaders was often no less than Hitler’s. The brutalities of the gulags expose the hollowness of the communist dream.

The Yugoslav writer Milovan Djilas, once a close aide of Tito, powerfully exposed the hypocrisy of communist elites in his landmark book The New Class. He argued that under communism, it is the communists themselves who become the new class of exploiters. It’s a book the Left ought to have the courage to read.

This is not to say that capitalism is inherently better or more desirable than communism. But the key difference is this: capitalist democracies still allow freedom of speech and expression — a liberty that is systematically crushed under communist dictatorships. That freedom matters. Because in a democracy, I can at least live as a human being, not a number in a prison camp. I can speak my mind, criticize the government, and still remain free.

That’s why preserving democracy is the only real solution. Not romanticizing communism. Not turning away from the horrors committed in its name. The only guiding principle must be the rejection of violence, injustice, and slavery — in every form, no matter the ideology. Human freedom must always remain our highest value.

Some of my friends get angry when I use terms like “communist dictatorship.” Ironically, it is their criticism that has inspired me to write this piece. I sincerely thank them. If they now choose to look away when they see me, so be it.

---

*Senior economist based in Ahmedabad

Comments

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan* “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

By Ram Puniyani The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Search This Blog