Citizens demand special session of Parliament on Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor

By A Representative

Over 300 concerned Indian citizens from across the country have written a joint appeal to top constitutional and political authorities, including the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, Chairperson of the Rajya Sabha, and key ministers in the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs, urging the Government of India to convene a Special Session of Parliament without delay.

The appeal comes in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, India’s military response in the form of Operation Sindoor, and related political and social developments. The citizens have cited eleven substantive grounds to justify the need for an urgent parliamentary session and warned that failure to act would betray the expectations of the Indian people.

The letter underscores that Article 75(3) of the Constitution mandates collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Lok Sabha. It argues that the government is constitutionally bound to place all facts related to the Pahalgam attack and subsequent operations before the Parliament. Citizens noted that while the military has achieved operational success, its narrative must not be manipulated for political gain.

The statement also raises concern over contradictory international claims—such as the American President crediting trade deals for the ceasefire—compared to the Indian Ministry of External Affairs' version.

Further, the signatories highlight the surge in communal violence, collective punishment, suppression of dissent, and irresponsible media coverage following the attack. These developments, they argue, require serious parliamentary debate. The letter questions why, despite public statements by the Prime Minister and military officials, the government is reluctant to face questions in Parliament. It criticizes the reliance on closed-door all-party meetings and calls for open and transparent deliberations under parliamentary scrutiny.

Drawing historical parallels, the appeal recalls that during the 1962 India-China war, a special parliamentary session was held following opposition demand, which was accepted by then Prime Minister Nehru. The citizens point out that the recently elected Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly already held a one-day special session and passed a resolution on the matter—setting an example for the national Parliament to follow.

The letter also stresses the need for accountability in light of civilian and military suffering in border areas, and the government’s obligation to uphold the rights of all citizens, especially dissenters. It reminds the government that convening special sessions is not unprecedented, citing the example of a session held in 2023 for the women’s reservation bill, just weeks after the Monsoon Session had ended.

The appeal critiques the declining number of Parliament sittings in recent years and insists that the Monsoon Session, scheduled from July 21 to August 12, cannot serve as a substitute for a focused, urgent discussion. It warns that such general sessions are already overburdened with a wide range of issues, leaving little time for in-depth debate on extraordinary developments like the Pahalgam attack and its aftermath.

The citizens argue that the government should have proactively convened a special session in June instead of announcing routine dates for the Monsoon Session. They emphasize that this demand stems from a desire to uphold constitutional values, preserve democratic accountability, and ensure the Parliament remains a forum where the government is answerable to the people—especially now that the immediate conflict has ceased.

If the government has legitimate security concerns regarding full public disclosure, the letter suggests it should clearly communicate that position to citizens. However, continued silence or delay in convening a special session would, the signatories contend, amount to a dereliction of democratic responsibility.

The joint appeal concludes with a firm declaration: “We the people of India demand answers and accountability from our government.” The list of 310 signatories has been made publicly available.

Comments

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan* “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

By Ram Puniyani The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Search This Blog