Skip to main content

In search of peace: Why the world’s most coveted prize remains elusive

By Harasankar Adhikari 
What is peace, and where can it be found? Sister Nivedita once remarked on “the nonsense about peace—where there is no peace.” Today, this observation feels more relevant than ever. Across continents and cultures, people yearn for peace, yet it remains tantalizingly out of reach. Our collective pursuit of peace is relentless, yet the world seems to grow more restless with each passing year.
Since 1901, the Nobel Peace Prize has honored 139 laureates for their contributions to global harmony. These awards celebrate the tireless efforts of individuals and organizations striving to make the world a better place. But if so many are working for peace, why does it remain so elusive? Why does the world still tremble on the brink of conflict, inequality, and unrest?
The answer may lie in the paradoxes of progress. As societies develop, they often become more competitive and self-centered. Individuals, families, and even nations are locked in battles for resources, recognition, and power. The poor cry out for food, while the rich lose sleep chasing ever more wealth. Dissatisfaction festers at every level, fueled by comparisons and unfulfilled desires. In this climate, genuine empathy and community are rare commodities.
Albert Einstein once wrote, “A calm and modest life brings more happiness than the pursuit of success combined with constant restlessness.” Yet, our modern world seems determined to prove the opposite. We chase success, power, and possessions—often at the expense of our own happiness and the well-being of others.
World politics, too, is a battleground. Leaders jostle for influence, sometimes ignoring the long-term consequences of their actions. Environmental crises are met with half-hearted measures. Nuclear arsenals are flaunted as symbols of strength, despite the haunting legacy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In this atmosphere, the rhetoric of peace is often just that—rhetoric.
Corruption and discrimination are rampant. Justice and equity have become buzzwords rather than guiding principles. International organizations draft rules for human rights and peace, but these are too often ignored or bent to suit political agendas. In some cases, politics itself becomes the breeding ground for terrorism and unrest.
Is holding protests, meetings, or candlelight vigils enough to build lasting peace? While such actions raise awareness, they rarely address the root causes of conflict. Today’s crises—social, economic, cultural, political, and environmental—are deeply intertwined. They demand more than symbolic gestures; they require honest self-reflection, systemic change, and a renewed commitment to justice and cooperation.
Peace cannot be imposed from above or won through competition. It must be cultivated within individuals and communities, through acts of kindness, understanding, and genuine solidarity. It requires us to look beyond our own interests and recognize our shared humanity.
As we search for peace, let us remember that it is not merely the absence of conflict, but the presence of justice, equity, and compassion. Only then can we hope to build a world where peace is not just a prize, but a lived reality for all.

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.

European banks accused of coal double standard after shunning Adani’s Galilee mine in Australia

By Rajiv Shah    European banks that helped shut down Adani ’s Galilee Basin coal frontier in Australia a decade ago are now bankrolling a far larger coal expansion just 150 kilometres away, according to a new report from Reclaim Finance and partner NGOs. The study , "Coal Hypocrisy: European Banks’ Double Standard on Thermal and Metallurgical Coal in Australia", finds that 19 European banks provided US$30.3 billion to companies planning metallurgical coal expansion in Queensland’s Bowen Basin between 2021 and 2025, out of a total of US$105.9 billion from international banks.