Skip to main content

Significant increase in 'killing civilians' by BSF men in WB border districts: NHRC told

Counterview Desk 
Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convenor, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), in a representation to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission has alleged that a poor marginalized youth Bikash Debnath, of Cooch Behar district, West Bengal, died after Border Security Force (BSF) personnel's "continuous tortured him for three hours".
He say, "Incidents of killing civilians by the BSF force have significantly increased in the bordering districts of the state of West Bengal in the past few years. This case also adding the list of murders in BSF’s custody where the higher official and police administration with a nexus tries to save the perpetrators.

Text:

This is to bring to your kind attention an incident of brutal killing of a poor marginalized youth namely Bikash Debnath from Uttar Chamta village under Sitai Block and Police Station in the district of Cooch Behar, by the perpetrator BSF personnel attached with Battalion number 75 of Koimari border outpost.
The victim was forcefully apprehended by the perpetrators BSF on duty, and continuous tortured him for three hours. Later his body was recovered from Indo Bangladesh border side. It is a clear case of murder in custody of BSF on duty.
Sitai Police took the body of the victim to the Sitai Block Hospital where the victim was declared as brought dead. Without doing inquest, the dead body of the victim was taken to Sitai Police Station and there the inquest was done by one police person of Sitai Police Station and one executive magistrate which was violated section 174 and 176 (1) (a) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
There were several injury marks in the body of the deceased observed by the family members and eye witnesses. Even they observed scratch marks in the land where the victim was beaten to death by the BSF personnel.
On December 12, 2021 in the evening the family members lodged one written complaint to the Sitai Police Station against BSF for the death of the victim. The then on duty police officer took the written complaint but did not provide any received copy to the victim’s family. No case was registered by the Police on that time.
On the next day from the GR section we received the information that one case was registered by the police vide Sitai Polife Station case number 198/21 dated December 12, 2021 under section 302. But in the FIR copy police did not mention the details of the accused just only mentioned ‘unknown persons’. No signature or thumb impression of the complainant was received in the FIR copy. In the complaint copy attach with FIR there is no specific allegation against the BSF authority.
We have an apprehension that police with the nexus of BSF made a fabricated complaint and took the signature of Biseswar Debnath, elder brother of the victim who is also an illiterate person.
This violates section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and apex court guidelines in the case of Lalita Kumari vs State of Uttar Pradesh [WP (Crl) 68 of 2008] which clearly states that immediate registration of First Information Report is mandatory under section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and provide the copy of the FIR to the complainant free of cost.
As the police personnel of Sitai Police Station did not take any action in this respect, on January 17, 2022, Khageswar Debnath, father of the deceased sent one written complaint to the Superintendent of Police, Cooch Behar.
Salient points in this case:
  • It is a case of death due to torture in custody of BSF under Battalion number 75 of Koimari Border Out Post.
  • Guidelines framed and circulated by NHRC in case of custodial death on March 27, 1997 was not followed by police personnel of Sitai Police Station and local civil administration.
  • Supreme Court of India in various cases, laid down norms to be followed in case of cognizable offence like custodial death; such as, immediate register of FIR, investigation by CID or police team of another police station led by a senior officer, etc. which was not followed here.
  • Why judicial Magistrate was not done the inquest of the victim as for custodial death any judicial magistrate should inquest the body?
  • Why the inquest was not done in the Sitai Block Hospital where the victim was declared dead?
  • Why the duty officer of the Sitai Police Station did not register the written complaint of the family members of the victim at first?
  • Why in the FIR copy police omitted the specific allegation of the BSF?
  • Till date place of incidents, witnesses, family members were not examined; scratch in the earth of the place of incidence, hair, fibbers were not collected.
  • The case of killing of human within Cooch Behar district is not only this one. Even under the Sitai Police Station jurisdiction area this is not a first killing done by BSF. In each case of killing, BSF and investigating police including civil administration nexus throttled the throat of criminal justice system.
  • This case manifests systematic impunity in our state of West Bengal.
It must be mentioned that incidents of killing civilians by the BSF have significantly increased in the bordering districts of the state of West Bengal in the past few years. This case also adding the list of murders in BSF’s custody where the higher official and police administration with a nexus tries to save the perpetrators.
The perpetrator BSF personnel not only violated the rights guaranteed in Article 21 of Indian Constitution but also the premise of Article 7 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as well as the Goal number 8 and 16 of Sustainable Development Goal earmarked by United Nations and in both these international instruments; the government of India is a party and have agreement.
The incident and subsequent impunity legitimize our long standing demand for immediate ratification of United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment.
Hence I seek your urgent intervention in this present complaint with the following demands of justice to the family of the victim:
  • BSF should be posted in actual border and not inside the villages.The whole incident must be investigated by a neutral agency appointed by the Commission.
  • This unlawful death should be properly investigated in line with Minnesota Protocol.
  • The unnatural death case initiated by Sitai Police Station on December 12, 2021 must be investigated properly under the appropriate legal provision.
  • The administration must take appropriate steps to control cross border smuggling in bordering villages.
  • The guilty BSF personnel involved in killing in custody must be booked and prosecuted in open court of law; not under in camera proceedings where accused, prosecutor and judge are brothers.
  • Disciplinary action should be initiated against the then on duty police personnel of Sitai Police Station who without doing the inquest in the place where the victim was declared dead, taking the victim’s dead body to the Sitai Police Station.
  • We have an apprehension that police with the nexus of BSF made fabricated the original written complaint of the victim’s family. Therefore, immediate steps to be taken to record the statements of the victim’s family members by one judicial magistrate under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
  • Police personnel involved in fabricating the victim’s complaint should be immediately charged with section 192 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.
  •  The family of the victim must be duly compensated and security and safety of the witnesses and family members must be ensured.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...
Post a Comment
»

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.
Post a Comment
»

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.
Post a Comment
»

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.
Post a Comment
»

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).
Post a Comment
»

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.
Post a Comment
»

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia." 
Post a Comment
»