Skip to main content

Rejection rate over 50%: Gujarat govt 'fails to give' forest rights, jobs to rural poor

By Virsing Fatiya Babhor, Paulomee Mistry, Prof Hemantkumar Shah*

The implementation of the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006 in Gujarat has been tardy. A total of 1,90,051 claims from 3,199 villages in 12 districts of the state have been filed individually and collectively for obtaining land ownership certificates under the Act. It consists of 1,82,869 individual claims and 7,182 community claims.
Of these, the state government has approved only 80,540 individual claims and 4,599 community claims. That means the state government has rejected 1,04,912 claims, about 56 per cent, and refused to grant land entitlement certificates to tribals and their communities who have lived there for decades.
We have also noticed that even for the claims that are accepted, the tribal farmers are given far less land than their claims. The land allocated is not equal to the land they have been cultivating.
Under FRA, receipts of fines imposed on tribal farmers by government officials for cultivating forest land is to be accepted as evidence of land ownership. Also, voter identity card, ration card, passport, building tax receipt, proof of residence, proof of check dams on agricultural land, hut etc. are also allowed as evidence. Yet, these are not taken into account.
Evidence from Panchmahals district suggests that not only these, but even the physical evidences like electricity and trees etc. are not taken into consideration in order to hand over the ownership of land.
People belonging to castes categorized under other backward class (OBC), known as Bakshi Panch in Gujarat, have given evidence of three generation of cultivating land. But their claims are rarely accepted.
On the other hand, in an effort to frustrate the forest dwellers’ claims over forest land, the state forest department forcibly plants trees on the lands of farmers whose claims have been denied and takes possession of the land.
In Virpur and Balasinor talukas the application forms submitted for the claims are not forwarded to the Forest Rights Committees for filing. The government authorities even reject claims approved by Gram Sabhas in their official meetings.

Implementation of MGNREGA

Quite like FRA implementation, in Gujarat, the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) too has been inadequate. As on March 14, 2022, this financial year, 46.27 lakh job cards were issued in Gujarat but out of these only 18.61 lakh were active.
The number of active workers in Gujarat is 31.52 lakh. Of these, 5.81 per cent belong to Scheduled Castes and 39.04 per cent belong to Scheduled Tribes. Details of how many days of employment is given in a year and how much daily wage is paid can be seen in the accompanying table.
These details show that
  1. As per the notification issued by the Central government on April 1, 2021, Rs 229 as wage has to be paid, but on an average, Rs 205 is paid. This is how it has been for years!
  2. Under Section-3 of the Act, the state government is required to provide employment for up to 100 days, but in Gujarat, employment is not provided for more than 50 days. Despite the corona epidemic, only 43 days of employment was provided in 2020- 21 followed by 49 days in 2021-22. Despite having 18.61 lakh active job cards, less than 35,000 were given 100 days of employment in the last five years.
  3. Increase in wages during the last five years has been to the tune of 15.82 per cent. That is, average increase in wages has been 3.16 per cent per year. Considering the rate of inflation for the last five years, the increase in wages ought to be five per cent per year. This shows that the real wages have declined.
  4. According to section-6(2) of the Act, the wages under MGNREGA must be equal to the minimum wage fixed for farm labour. At present the minimum wage of farm labour in Gujarat officially is Rs 324.20. But the official daily wage under MGNREGA is Rs 229.
Some of the practical problems with enforcement of the law are as follows:
  • Under MGNREGA, many workers are not paid on time even though it is legally mandatory to pay them within 15 days. For example, the information that we have collected suggests, as on March 14, arrears remained to be paid to 4,000 workers in Poshina taluka, 3,800 workers in Khedbrahma taluka, 3200 workers in Wadali taluka and 3,000 workers in Idar taluka. The same is true of Aravalli district. In many places wages are paid after two months.
  • Spots where work under MGNREGA is carried out, arrangements like drinking water, first aid, shade etc. are not made as per the guidelines under the law.
  • For jobs like deepening of lake, installing electricity poles, construction of roads etc. in forest areas, the officials of the forest department stop work. Because of this the tribals do not get employment under MGNREGA.
  • MGNREGA is a demand-based employment law. But when a worker goes to ask for work, the acknowledgment for the same by the panchayat is not given. As a result, there is no proof if the work is provided, hence no claim for unemployment benefits can be made.
  • Unemployment allowance is not given to those who are not given work if they apply for it.
  • Those in charge of implementing MGNREGA are not permanent employees of the government, they work on contract and are temporary. If they are made permanent, the implementation of the law can improve.
---
*Respectively: President, Eklvaya Sangathan; general secretary, MGNREGA Workers' Union; president, MGNREGA Workers’ Union

Comments

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."