Skip to main content

Report exposes human rights gaps in India's $36 billion garment export industry

Counterview News    
A new report sheds light on the urgent human rights challenges within India’s vast textile and garment industry, as global regulations increasingly demand corporate accountability in supply chains. Titled “Beneath the Seams,” the study reveals that despite the sector employing over 45 million people, systemic issues of poverty wages, unfair purchasing practices, and the exclusion of workers from decision-making persist, leaving millions vulnerable.
The report, published by Change Alliance and the Fair Trade Advocacy Office, consolidates findings from multi-stakeholder workshops held in Delhi, Bengaluru, and Tiruppur. It comes at a critical time as laws like the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) begin to mandate human rights and environmental due diligence for companies operating in the EU market, directly impacting major exporting nations like India.
A central finding is the widespread confusion and failure to ensure living wages and incomes. The report highlights a critical gap between the legally mandated minimum wage and a living wage that covers basic needs like food, housing, and healthcare. Workers, suppliers, and even factory management often conflate the two concepts.
Suppliers stated they cannot raise wages unless brands pay fairer prices, while brands’ public commitments to living wages frequently fail to be integrated into binding contracts or costing models. The result is that many workers, a majority of whom are women and migrants, remain trapped in poverty despite full-time employment.
Exploitative purchasing practices by international brands were identified as a root cause of poor working conditions. Practices such as demanding rapid deliveries at low costs, last-minute order changes, and order cancellations—exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic—transfer all financial risk to suppliers. This pressure leads to wage suppression, forced overtime, and widespread subcontracting to informal units where worker protections vanish. Furthermore, when brands face compliance issues, they often resort to abrupt “cut-and-run” disengagement, leaving workers jobless without compensation, as there is no binding framework for responsible exit.
The report also underscores a profound lack of meaningful engagement with the workers and communities at the heart of the supply chain. Existing grievance mechanisms, like Internal Complaints Committees, are widely distrusted, with workers fearing retaliation. Social audits are costly yet have limited impact, often conducted without genuine worker involvement. Women and migrant workers are systematically excluded from decision-making processes, and trade unions face shrinking space in dialogues, sometimes being stigmatised as “anti-business.”
The report calls for decisive action from multiple stakeholders. It urges the Indian and other South Asian governments to strengthen laws, enforce living wages, protect informal workers, and restart comprehensive labour data collection. For the European Union, it recommends ensuring the CSDDD mandates full supply chain coverage, bans unfair purchasing practices, and requires meaningful stakeholder consultation and responsible disengagement. International institutions are called upon to promote living wage standards, support worker participation, and improve grievance mechanisms.
The document concludes that without binding legislation, shared financial responsibility, and a fundamental shift to include workers’ voices, new due diligence laws risk becoming another compliance exercise that fails to improve lives on the ground. As one workshop participant noted, the disconnect is stark: “The government talks about ‘ease of doing business’ but ignores ‘ease of living’ for workers.” The report positions the current moment as a pivotal opportunity to reshape the industry into one that is equitable, sustainable, and respectful of the rights of the millions who fuel its global success.

Comments

TRENDING

How strategic is India's commercial expansion in the Mediterranean?

By Vijay Prashad  On 26 October 2026, Greece’s foreign minister George Gerapetritis stood at the United Nations headquarters and rejected the maritime agreement between Turkey and Libya. Gerapetritis spoke on behalf of Greece of course, but also Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, the European Union, and the United Arab Emirates. Five days later, the Indian frigate INS Trishul entered Souda Bay in Crete as part of activities with the US Navy installation (Naval Support Activity) and with the NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training Centre. The sequence illuminates a developing strategic geography: India’s naval reach, its confrontation with Pakistan’s new Turkish partner, and its ambition to connect Indian capital to European markets increasingly converge in the eastern Mediterranean.

Letter to Modi seeks cancellation of "coercive" anti-NGO order on foreign funding rules

By A Representative  Around 70 civil rights organizations have come together to strategize “a collective response to the stifling of civil society space” in the wake of the recent Government of India clampdown on NGOs, telling Prime Minister Narendra Modi that government steps are “coercive” in nature, are “without reasonable cause or due process”, and seek to “cripple” the ability of NGOs to “carry on their legitimate and sanctioned work.”

The Modi-Adani relationship: Corporate power, political proximity and accountability

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   India's economic transformation over the past decade has been marked by ambitious infrastructure projects, increased global investment and the emergence of powerful corporate conglomerates. Alongside this growth, however, concerns about crony capitalism, the concentration of economic power and the influence of political connections on business opportunities have become increasingly prominent.