Skip to main content

Advocacy group flags uneven export gains as new trade pact announced

By A Representative 
The Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has cautioned that India’s latest free trade agreement risks widening regional inequality, arguing that export growth remains concentrated in a small number of states despite rising national figures.
In a statement titled Free Trade, Unequal India, CFA said the commerce ministry’s celebration of new trade deals “hides a deeper worry,” pointing to Reserve Bank of India data that reveals a widening geographic divide.
“A handful of states now drive almost all exports. Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh together control nearly 70 per cent of India’s export basket. This level of concentration is not healthy. It tells us growth is clustering fast and leaving most of the country behind,” the note said.
According to CFA, more than 90 per cent of India’s exports originate from just ten states, leaving the remaining twenty “fighting over scraps.” The organisation highlighted sharp gains in Gujarat, supported by ports, industrial corridors, and long-standing manufacturing ecosystems that attract both private and public investment.
CFA argued that this spatial concentration is reinforced by financial flows. “Money deposited in Bihar or eastern Uttar Pradesh is lent to factories on the coast. Labour migrates. Capital migrates. Goods flow back in. This is not integration. It is dependence,” it stated, adding that high credit-deposit ratios in coastal states contrast with capital outflows from the hinterland.
The group warned that free trade agreements, without accompanying domestic investment, could entrench the divide. “More exports from the same few states will only harden the divide... India risks becoming two economies in one country — a coastal exporter and a stranded hinterland.”
CFA called for long-term public spending, stronger state-level industrial capacity, and banking reforms to ensure credit reaches regions that currently supply labour and savings but lack local industry.

Comments

TRENDING

How strategic is India's commercial expansion in the Mediterranean?

By Vijay Prashad  On 26 October 2026, Greece’s foreign minister George Gerapetritis stood at the United Nations headquarters and rejected the maritime agreement between Turkey and Libya. Gerapetritis spoke on behalf of Greece of course, but also Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, the European Union, and the United Arab Emirates. Five days later, the Indian frigate INS Trishul entered Souda Bay in Crete as part of activities with the US Navy installation (Naval Support Activity) and with the NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training Centre. The sequence illuminates a developing strategic geography: India’s naval reach, its confrontation with Pakistan’s new Turkish partner, and its ambition to connect Indian capital to European markets increasingly converge in the eastern Mediterranean.

Letter to Modi seeks cancellation of "coercive" anti-NGO order on foreign funding rules

By A Representative  Around 70 civil rights organizations have come together to strategize “a collective response to the stifling of civil society space” in the wake of the recent Government of India clampdown on NGOs, telling Prime Minister Narendra Modi that government steps are “coercive” in nature, are “without reasonable cause or due process”, and seek to “cripple” the ability of NGOs to “carry on their legitimate and sanctioned work.”

The Modi-Adani relationship: Corporate power, political proximity and accountability

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   India's economic transformation over the past decade has been marked by ambitious infrastructure projects, increased global investment and the emergence of powerful corporate conglomerates. Alongside this growth, however, concerns about crony capitalism, the concentration of economic power and the influence of political connections on business opportunities have become increasingly prominent.