Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative

Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Observers point out that the scheme, which provides a legal guarantee of employment to rural households, proved crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic when millions of migrant workers returned to their villages and depended on it for survival. Despite earlier criticism of the programme by sections of the ruling establishment, MGNREGA functioned as a safety net for rural India during this period.

Questions have also been raised about funding trends, especially by the Socialist Party (India) in a statement issued by its national spokesperson, Basant Hetamsaria. After reaching a high of Rs. 1.11 lakh crore in 2020–21 during the pandemic, allocations have since declined to around Rs. 86,000 crore, even as demand for work under the scheme remains significant. In addition, several states, including West Bengal, have complained that pending central funds have not been released for extended periods, affecting employment opportunities and wage payments for rural workers.

Critics contend that MGNREGA represents core Gandhian values such as the right to work, dignity of labour and social justice, and that altering its name distracts from more pressing issues. They have urged the government to focus instead on addressing states’ grievances, ensuring timely fund releases, increasing wages, expanding the number of guaranteed workdays and providing stable budgetary support. They called on the government to strengthen rather than dilute the scheme.

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor* Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The politics of dreaming: Savita Singh's feminist imagination

By Ravi Ranjan* In contemporary Hindi poetry, few voices have explored the philosophical and creative possibilities of women's experience as powerfully as Savita Singh. Across collections such as "Svapna Samay" (Dream Time), Aapne Jaisa Jeevan, and "Prem Bhi Ek Yatana" Hai, she has developed a poetic world in which woman is not merely a subject of suffering or social commentary but a creator of knowledge, meaning, and alternative realities.

Counterview

Search This Blog