Skip to main content

Bangladesh in turmoil: Rising insecurity, sectarian forces gain ground

By Bharat Dogra 
Many who initially welcomed the ouster of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina are now reconsidering their stance. The reasons are stark. Law and order has deteriorated sharply, leaving large sections of the population—particularly political opponents—deeply vulnerable. Minorities report growing insecurity, with disturbing incidents of targeted violence. Inter-faith harmony is under unprecedented strain, while prospects for fair elections are fading as major political parties, including those with strong minority support, face exclusion and obstruction.  
At the same time, sectarian and fundamentalist groups—long known for exploiting divisions and resorting to violence—are gaining strength. These forces played a central role in Hasina’s removal and continue to benefit from external backing. The involvement of foreign powers, often denouncing sectarian violence publicly while covertly supporting such groups for strategic ends, raises troubling questions. Former Prime Minister Hasina herself has pointed to the hand of foreign and sectarian forces in her ouster.  
The tragedy is compounded by the deaths of many protesters during the anti-Hasina movement. While some demonstrators may have genuinely sought a better future, the protests were largely shaped by regime-change operations, often manipulating sincere citizens without their awareness. History shows that such externally influenced movements, unlike genuine reform efforts, frequently unleash instability and violence.  
Bangladesh’s painful history underscores these dangers. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the nation’s founding leader and Hasina’s father, was assassinated along with most of his family by forces later revealed to have foreign and sectarian links. Hasina herself survived multiple assassination attempts.  
Yet, despite adversities, UN reports confirm that during much of Hasina’s tenure, Bangladesh achieved significant progress in human development indicators. Many successful initiatives emerged, though in her final years, positive achievements were overshadowed by a flood of negative narratives—a pattern seen in other regime-change operations.  
The current trajectory is deeply worrying. For South Asia, the path forward must rest on secularism, inter-faith harmony, minority protection, inclusive democracy, socio-economic equality, and environmental sustainability. Only such a vision can reduce distress and foster lasting welfare. Sadly, the region is drifting away from this ideal, casting a shadow of sadness across the subcontinent. Still, hope remains if citizens remain vigilant and committed to steering South Asia toward cooperation and justice.  
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Protecting Earth for Children, Man over Machine, When the Two Streams Met, and A Day in 2071

Comments

TRENDING

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.