Skip to main content

Benevolence of 'General Dyer'? How sedition became a membership perk in Gujarat

By Prof. Hemantkumar Shah* 
Reports indicate that on December 18, 2025, the Surat District and Sessions Court approved the Gujarat government’s decision to withdraw the sedition case against BJP MLA Hardik Patel. This follows a similar move in March, where the Ahmedabad Sessions Court sanctioned the withdrawal of another case against him. In both instances, Hardik and four of his associates were granted a clean slate.
These cases date back to 2015, when Hardik Patel led the Patidar reservation movement—not as a seasoned politician, but as a citizen activist. The Surat case specifically involved allegations that he incited Patel youths to attack the police rather than commit suicide. It was a charge that carried a potential sentence ranging from three years to life imprisonment. Now, that legal threat has simply vanished.
A Political Masterstroke or Legal Mockery?
Why did the Gujarat government suddenly lose its appetite for prosecution? In Gujarat, the "government" is widely understood to be synonymous with Narendra Modi and Amit Shah; folk wisdom suggests not a leaf stirs in the state administration without their nod.
The reason for this sudden leniency is transparent: Hardik Patel is now in the BJP. In 2019, he joined the Congress and rose to the rank of Working President. Yet, he eventually defected to the very party whose leader, Amit Shah, he had once famously branded "General Dyer." One can only assume that the looming fear of a prison sentence prompted a political bargain: "Join the BJP, and the cases disappear."
The Erosion of Equality
This isn't just about Hardik Patel; it is a fundamental question of the rule of law and our judicial integrity. If Hardik Patel never committed sedition, why was he charged in the first place? If he did, why was the case withdrawn before the court could reach a verdict? The answer is simple: between 2015 and 2022, he was an opponent, so the cases remained. Today, he is a member of the fold, so the cases are gone.
This is a textbook example of discriminatory governance. When a government operates on the principle that "one of our own can do no wrong," it violates the very essence of democracy and the Fundamental Rights to equality enshrined in Articles 14 and 15 of the Indian Constitution. But such principles are currently being "sent to the oil mills" (ignored). In a regime where one man acts as the ultimate arbiter, "General Dyer" decides who deserves the rain of mercy and who deserves the heat of the law.
A Tale of Two Leaders
Contrast this with the case of Jignesh Mevani.
In 2022, a BJP worker in Kokrajhar, Assam, filed a case against Mevani. The Assam Police rushed to Palanpur, Gujarat, and whisked him away overnight, forcing him to endure the grueling legal cycles of a distant state. Did that BJP worker act alone, or was the "General Dyer" spirit at work there too?
Unlike Hardik, Jignesh chose not to trade his principles for a BJP membership to escape his legal woes. For Jignesh, individual liberty and dissent are paramount; for Hardik, the "benevolence" of the powerful is his shield.
The Question of Legacy
Hardik Patel is my friend; Jignesh Mevani was my student. Both are now MLAs—one from the BJP, one from the Congress. Ask yourselves: Which one should I be proud of?
More importantly, set aside my personal pride and ask: Should we not be deeply concerned about the blatant destruction of our democratic fabric?
---
*Senior academic based in Ahmedabad 

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.
Post a Comment
»

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.
Post a Comment
»

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.
Post a Comment
»