Report flags rise in POCSO case disposals, notes persistent backlog

By A Representative

A recent study has claimed that India disposed of more cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act in 2025 than were registered during the same year, marking what the authors describe as a significant shift in case management within the justice system. According to the report, titled “Pendency to Protection: Achieving the Tipping Point to Justice for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse”, 80,320 POCSO cases were registered in 2025, while 87,754 cases were disposed of, resulting in a disposal rate of 109 percent.

The study, conducted by the Centre for Legal Action and Behaviour Change (C-LAB) for Children, an initiative of India Child Protection, has characterised this development as a “tipping point” where the judicial system, in its assessment, begins to reduce rather than merely manage backlog. The report further claims that 24 states recorded disposal rates exceeding 100 percent during the year, indicating that these states disposed of not only newly registered cases but also some from previous years.

The report states that India’s total backlog of POCSO cases stood at 2,62,089 as of 2023. It argues that sustaining disposal rates above 100 percent could gradually reduce this pendency. As part of its recommendations, the study proposes the establishment of 600 additional e-POCSO courts, which it claims could eliminate the entire backlog within four years. It estimates the required expenditure at approximately ₹1,977 crore over four years and suggests that resources from the Nirbhaya Fund could be utilised for this purpose.

At the same time, the report flags several concerns, including the duration for which cases remain unresolved. It says that nearly half of all pending POCSO cases have been unresolved for more than two years, and that conviction rates continue to fluctuate across states. The report highlights inter-state disparities, stating that Uttar Pradesh accounts for 37 percent of cases pending for more than five years, followed by Maharashtra at 24 percent and West Bengal at 11 percent. Together, these three states are said to account for nearly three-fourths of long-pending cases exceeding five years.

Commenting on the findings, Purujit Praharaj, Director (Research) at India Child Protection, said that disposing of more cases than those registered reflects a shift from intent to measurable outcomes. He stated that prolonged delays intensify trauma for child survivors and emphasised the need to sustain higher disposal rates to ensure timely, child-centred justice.

The report also notes variations in performance among states and Union Territories. It claims that seven states and Union Territories recorded disposal rates above 150 percent, seven others between 121 and 150 percent, and 10 states between 100 and 120 percent. According to the study, these figures indicate that pendency often accumulates early in a case’s lifecycle and that systemic challenges persist in moving cases forward within expected timelines.

In addition to infrastructure expansion, the report recommends year-on-year disposal rates above 100 percent across all states and Union Territories, targeted technical and administrative support for lagging judicial systems, and closer monitoring of conviction and acquittal trends. It also advocates the use of AI-based legal research and document management tools to improve case analysis and efficiency.

The study is based on data, as of December 2, 2025, drawn from the National Judicial Data Grid, the National Crime Records Bureau, and responses to questions raised in the Lok Sabha.

Comments

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."

School job scam and the future of university degree holders in West Bengal

By Harasankar Adhikari The school recruitment controversy in West Bengal has emerged as one of the most serious governance challenges in recent years, raising concerns about transparency, institutional accountability, and the broader impact on society. Allegations that school jobs were obtained through irregular means have led to prolonged legal scrutiny, involving both the Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court of India. In one instance, a panel for high school teacher recruitment was ultimately cancelled after several years of service, following extended judicial proceedings and debate.

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

Search This Blog