Skip to main content

Row over alleged incident involving Bihar CM, NCW action sought

By A Representative 
The National Federation of Youth Movement (NFYM) has condemned an alleged recent incident involving Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, in which he was reportedly seen pulling the niqab of a Muslim woman, and has demanded that the National Commission for Women (NCW) take cognisance of the matter.
In a press statement issued to the media, NFYM Chairman Masihuzzama Ansari described the incident as unfortunate and said it amounted to an affront to the dignity and self-respect of a woman. He urged the NCW to issue a notice to the Chief Minister and ensure appropriate action.
The organisation stated that individuals occupying constitutional offices are expected to demonstrate sensitivity, restraint and responsible conduct, and that such behaviour runs contrary to democratic values, constitutional propriety and social norms.
Referring to claims made by some quarters that the Chief Minister may be mentally unwell, NFYM said that mental illness cannot be cited as a justification for inappropriate conduct. It added that if a person is genuinely unfit to discharge responsibilities due to mental health reasons, they should refrain from holding constitutional office or participating in public engagements.
NFYM appealed to the NCW to view the matter as an issue concerning a woman’s dignity and identity, and to act without discrimination. The organisation reiterated that there can be no compromise on the respect, dignity and rights of women.
The statement also expressed concern over what NFYM described as a pattern of incidents in recent years affecting Muslims, other minority communities, vulnerable sections and marginalised groups, particularly women and children, in educational institutions and other social spaces.
NFYM further alleged that in several cases, mental illness has been cited as a defence to evade legal and social accountability, which it said undermines both the justice system and democratic values. It referred to past cases, including the “Sulli Deals” and “Bulli Bai” online harassment incidents involving Muslim women, as well as the July 31, 2023 shooting incident on a superfast express train, where mental illness was reportedly cited later.
The organisation asserted that such incidents should not be treated as isolated acts but as matters of broader social and institutional responsibility, and called for strict legal action against those found guilty, without any discrimination.

Comments

TRENDING

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.