Skip to main content

Free vaccine for vote: 'Misleading' Modi talk ahead of Gujarat, Himachal polls

By Rosamma Thomas* 

Over a year ago, in October 2021, Prime Minister Narendra Modi claimed that his government had achieved the milestone of 100 crore vaccination doses, and the vaccination campaign against Covid-19 was free. Speaking at an election rally in Himachal Pradesh, BJP president JP Nadda called on voters to thank PM Modi for the vaccines by voting the party back to power in the state.
Earlier, the prime minister had instructed the BJP to set up helpdesks at vaccination centres. The Cowin website of the government that tracks vaccination doses administered lists over 219 crore doses as of November 6, 2022.
While the government takes pride in its vaccination achievement, it is worth recalling that the Supreme Court had intervened last year to question the initially proposed pricing policy for the vaccination campaign, forcing the government to change its stance. Also in Union Budget 2021, Rs35,000 crore was allocated for vaccination.
Transparency in governance campaigner Commodore Lokesh Batra, in a Right to Information petition in December 2021, sought details of the total amount paid to vaccine manufacturers. Government of India enterprise HLL Lifecare Limited, in its response of January 25, 2022, showed that a total of Rs 26,936 had been paid to vaccine manufacturers until then.
“How can the government claim that it has conducted a successful and free vaccination campaign when this is taxpayers’ money?” wondered Commodore Batra. Besides, private operators had been providing vaccine on payment.
In India’s private hospitals, the cost of the vaccination doses was also the highest in the world. In response to an RTI petition from Commodore Batra, the government also admitted that it had no record of the number of doses administered in private hospitals.
There were also reports that orders for vaccination doses were not placed with manufacturers in time, stalling the process. “Poor planning, piecemeal procuring and unregulated pricing,” BBC reported, had caused India’s vaccination drive to stumble.
What is astounding is that while the government had planned for dealing with those who might be hesitant to get the vaccine, there was no plan in place for reporting of adverse reactions after receiving the vaccination. In May 2022, Supreme Court intervened to direct the government to set up a system for online reporting of adverse events.
How can the government claim it has conducted successful and free vaccination campaign when this is taxpayers’ money?
By November 2022, news website Scroll reported that over 1,000 deaths were reported after vaccination in India. There is also cause to suspect that the number of adverse events and deaths is grossly underestimated – while Kerala reported 490 adverse events and 242 deaths, Uttar Pradesh, which has administered six times more doses of the vaccine, showed only 159 adverse events and 85 deaths.
In April 2022, Denmark became the first country in the world to halt its Covid-19 vaccination programme. Calls for an immediate halt to vaccination were earlier made in India too, where activists noted that the vaccine was causing more harm than the virus.
Vaccines were being administered to pregnant women too, although a Right to Information application seeking the results of such tests showed that the government had not conducted any trials on pregnant women. There was no scientific evidence that the vaccines were safe for pregnant women, and no information at all on how the fetus might be impacted.
Across the world, as the data emerges on the Covid vaccination drive, questions are being raised about the need for a vaccine at all – given that the threat from the virus was initially grossly exaggerated, through computer modeling procedures that were off the mark by leagues. Early warnings were suppressed or ignored in many countries.
Ordinary Indians, however, are waking to the problems with the vaccine. The demand for vaccination has nosedived and stocks are being allowed to expire. So is Prime Minister Modi singing the wrong tune ahead of polling in Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh?
---
*Freelance journalist. Click here for RTI response

Comments

TRENDING

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

Concerns raised over move to rename MGNREGA, critics call it politically motivated

By A Representative   Concerns have been raised over the Union government’s reported move to rename the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), with critics describing it as a politically motivated step rather than an administrative reform. They argue that the proposed change undermines the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi and seeks to appropriate credit for a programme whose relevance has been repeatedly demonstrated, particularly during times of crisis.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."