Skip to main content

Hindutva groups threat to peace, freedom: US diaspora groups tell FBI, other govt depts

By A Representative 

The Islamophobic and neo-Nazi ideology of Hindutva is a clear and present danger to peace and freedoms in the United States, a coalition of civil rights organizations told key officials of the U.S. Attorney General’s Office, the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) at a recent event in Edison, New Jersey.
At the event titled United Against Hate, activists from American Muslims for Democracy (AMD), Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR) and Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) made detailed presentations on this ideology of Hindu supremacism that is committing mass persecution of India’s Muslims and Christians and is rearing its ugly head in New Jersey as well as across the US.
Attending the event were David S Leonardis, Special Investigator from the New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety; Michael E Campion, Chief of the Civil Rights Division for the US Attorney General's Office; and Jonathan R Norbut of the U.S. Department of Justice. The law enforcement officials took questions during the panel from community members, who raised concerns about safety.
“As American citizens, we have a responsibility to ensure we stand for justice for all. We need to be aware of this development that's occurring in the United States,” said Dr Ali Chaudry, Board Member of AMD. “We cannot have any group coming in and intimidating [people], whether it's a bulldozer or speeches or appearing at Teaneck Council meetings, or in Woodbridge, or Edison or anywhere in the country.”
Mohammad Jawad, President, New Jersey Chapter, IAMC, made a presentation on the origins of Hindu supremacism in India as a far-right reactionary ideology a century ago.
“The [Hindutva movement] is… running programmes parallel to those in Germany in 1937. India's Hindu extremists are calling for genocide against Muslims,” Jawad said. “What is really being done to stop it? Because the international community is not doing as much as we want.”
“America today is in a moment of deep reckoning with racism, which is a very good thing,” said Sunita Vishwanath, Executive Director, Hindus for Human Rights. “But the most public-facing expression of my community – I am talking about many Hindu American organizations – are taking advantage of the country's deep thinking about racism and treatment of communities of color to peddle Hindutva, or Hindu nationalism, or Hindu fascism.”
“So when you meet people from the Hindu community, remember that if they are talking about the problem of Hinduphobia and denying the harmful ideology of Hindutva, they are peddling fascism, and they do not represent all Hindus.”
“The conversations that we’re having here are very important,” said DOJ’s Norbut. “It’s to inform us and to inform the community, and to continue the dialogue so that organizations such as yours can continue to inform the US government and work to influence foreign policy.”

Comments

TRENDING

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.

Women lawyers petition Supreme Court, seek reconsideration of Aug 4 order on bar council co-option

By A Representative   A group of women advocates who stood sixth and seventh among female candidates in the recent Bar Council elections have filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking a recall and reconsideration of the Court’s August 4 order determining the mechanism for co-opting women into State Bar Councils.