Skip to main content

JNUTA accuses JNU administration of 'lawlessness without limits' in faculty termination case

By A Representative 
The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association (JNUTA) on Thursday issued a strong statement accusing the university administration of “lawlessness without limits” in its handling of the case involving Dr. Rohan Choudhari, a faculty member of the Centre for Political Studies whose termination has been challenged in court.
The JNUTA statement, dated September 18, 2025, referred to a Delhi High Court order that recorded the university’s submission that Dr. Choudhari’s termination “will be kept in abeyance” until the University Court disposed of his appeal. 
According to JNUTA, despite the appeal being submitted on September 9, no steps were taken by the administration to implement the assurance until September 15, when Dr. Choudhari filed another application before the High Court seeking clarification. The association said that only after this move did the university acknowledge his appeal, confirm his membership of the faculty, and release his pending salary.
“The termination was always a vindictive act in which the contemptuous attitude of the VC and her retinue towards statutory provisions and rules and regulations were in full display,” JNUTA said, adding that the administration’s subsequent actions showed “contempt for the Court order.”
The association also objected to the creation of a “Standing Committee for Confirmation,” which it described as a “sudden invention” without statutory backing. The notice issued to Dr. Choudhari on September 17, asking him to appear before this committee within days, was termed by JNUTA as “yet another instance of the lawlessness that has gripped the University.”
Raising broader concerns, the statement alleged that faculty promotions, particularly of women, were being delayed or denied as a means of exerting pressure. It criticized the vice chancellor’s “ruling by fear,” claiming that legitimate promotion cases had been pending for years and that some senior faculty were being forced to retire without clarity on their designation.
“As the JNUTA has already stated, the VC has lost all legitimacy among the University faculty. This will not be reclaimed by her continuing efforts at terrorizing the faculty and victimizing those who speak up,” the statement said.
The association concluded by reaffirming its support for faculty members who, in its words, “stand with their heads held high” in resisting what it described as “a vicious Administration.”

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Reclaiming the self: Feminist consciousness in three poetic traditions

By Ravi Ranjan   Savita Singh’s Main Kiski Aurat Hoon stands today as one of the most intellectually expansive works in contemporary Hindi poetry—a poem that begins with a seemingly simple question of women’s identity but unfolds into a profound meditation on selfhood, history, language, and human freedom. When read alongside Kishwar Naheed’s Hum Gunahgaar Auratein and Adrienne Rich’s Diving into the Wreck , Singh’s poem becomes part of a global feminist conversation that interrogates how identities are constructed, imposed, resisted, and ultimately re‑imagined.